Validation of computer morphs for grading contact lens complications

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 341-349

  Efron, Nathan ^a   Morgan, Philip B ^a   Jagpal, Ritu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Computer grading morphs; Contact lens complications; Grading tools; Printed grading scales; Reliability; Validation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALE UP; VALIDATION PROCESS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EYE DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; OPTOMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONTACT LENSES; EYE DISEASES; HUMANS; OPTOMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036631687     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00049.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Addison, G. (1997) Computer Morphing of Contact Lens Complications. Creation and Assessment of a New Method of Grading Contact Lens Complications. BSc Dissertation. Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, UK.
2. Andersen, J. S., Davies, I. P., Kruse, A., Lofstrom, T. and Ringmann, L. A. (1996) Handbook of Contact Lens Management. Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
3. Annunziato, T., Davidson, R. G., Christensen, M. T., Deloach, J., Pazandak, B. B., Thurburn, L., Gluck, D. and Lay, M. (circa 1992) Aatlas of Slit Lamp Findings and Contact Lens-Related Anomalies. Southwest Independent Institutional Review Board, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
4. Bailey, I. L., Bullimore, M. A., Raash, T. W. and Taylor, H. R. (1991) Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 32, 422-432.
5. Begley, C. G. (1992) Giant papillary conjunctivitis. In: Complications of Contact Lens Wear (ed. A. Tomlinson). Mosby, St Louis, USA, pp. 244-245.
6. Bland, J. M. and Altman, D. G. (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8476, 307-310.
7. Bron, A. J. (1997) The Doyne Lecture. Reflections on the tears. Eye 11, 583-602.
8. Buchner, A., Faul, F. and Erdfelder, E. (1997) G Power: A priori, Post-hoc, and Compromise Power Analyses for the Macintosh Version 2.1.2. (Computer program). University of Trier, Trier, Germany.
9. Bullimore, M. A. and Bailey, I. L. (1993) Considerations in the subjective assessment of cataract. Optom. Vis. Sci. 70, 880-885.
10. Chong, T., Simpson, T. and Fonn, D. (2000) The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales. Optom. Vis. Sci. 77, 244-251.
11. Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit. (1997) CCLRU grading scales (Appendix D). In: Contact Lenses (eds A. J. Phillips and L. Speedwell). Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, pp. 863-867.
12. Courtney, R. C. and Lee, J. M. (1982) Predicting ocular intolerance of a contact lens solution by use of a filter system enhancing fluorescein staining detection. Int. Contact Lens Clin. 9, 302-310.
13. Davies, M. (1978) Safety evaluation of new soft lens materials. In: Soft Contact Lenses. Clinical and Applied Technology (ed. M. Ruben). Bailliere Tindall, London, UK, pp. 378-379.
14. Dundas, M., Walker, A. and Woods, R. L. (2000) Clinical grading of corneal staining of non-contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 21, 30-35.
15. Efron, N. (1997) Clinical application of grading scales for contact lens complications. Optician 213, 26-34.
16. Efron, N. (1998) Grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 18, 182-186.
17. Efron, N. (1999) Efron Grading Scales for Contact Lens Complications, 1st edn. Appendix A. Contact Lens Complications. Butterworth-Heinemann - Optician, Oxford, UK, pp. 171-179.
18. Efron, N. (2000) Grading scales. Optician 219, 42-43.
19. Efron, N. (2002) Efron grading scales for contact lens complications (millennium edition). Appendix K. In: Contact Lens Practice (ed. N. Efron). Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. UK, pp. 487-489.
20. Efron, N. and Morgan, P. B. (1999) Contact Lens Complications CD. In: Contact Lens Complications (ed. N. Efron), Butterworth-Heinemann - Optician, Oxford, UK.
21. Efron, N. and Morgan, P. B. (2001a) Efron Grading Morphs. In: Contact Lens Complications CD - An Interactive Multi-Media Tool (eds N. Efron and P. B. Morgan). Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
22. Efron, N. and Morgan, P. B. (2001b) The Efron Grading Tutor. In: Contact Lens Complications CD - An Interactive Multi-Media Tool (eds N. Efron and P., B. Morgan). Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
23. Efron, N., Morgan, P. B. and Katsara, S. S. (2001) Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 21, 17-29.
24. Fieguth, P. and Simpson, T. (2002) Automated measurement of bulbar redness. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43, 340-347.
25. ISO, 5725-1 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - part 1: general principles and definitions. International Organisation for Standardisation, Switzerland.
26. Koch, D. D., de Sanabria, M. C., Sanning, F. B. and Soper, J. W. (1984) Atlas of Illustrations. Adverse Effects of Contact Lens Wear. An Atlas for the Ophthalmic Practitioner. Slack, Thorofare, NJ, USA, pp. 41-57.
27. Lofstrom, T., Andersen, J. S. and Kruse, A. (1998) Tarsal abnormalities: a new grading system. Contact Lens Assoc. Ophthalmol. J. 24, 210-215.
28. MacKinven, J., McGuinness, C. L., Pascal, E. and Woods, R. L. (2001) Clinical grading of the upper palpebral conjunctiva of non-contact lens wearers. Optom. Vis. Sci. 78, 13-18.
29. Mandell, R. B. (1987) Slit lamp classification system. J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 58, 198-201.
30. McMonnies, C. W. and Chapman-Davies, A. (1987) Assessment of conjunctival hyperaemia in contact lens wearers. Part I. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 64, 246-250.
31. Owen, C. G., Fitzke, F. W. and Woodward, E. G. (1996) A new computer assisted objective method for quantifying vascular changes of the bulbar conjunctivae. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 16, 430-437.
32. Papas, E. B. (2000) Key factors in the subjective and objective assessment of conjunctival erythema. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41, 687-691.
33. Schnider, C. M. (1990) Rigid gas-permeable extended wear. Contact Lens Spectrum 5, 101-104.
34. Woods, R. (1989) Quantitative slit lamp observations in contact lens practice. J. Br. Contact. Lens Assoc. Scientific Meetings 42-45.