Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries

Saudi Medical Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 811-813

  Mesleh, Ratib A ^a   Al Sawadi, Hussein M ^a   Kurdi, Ahmed M ^a  

^a The General Directorate of Armed Forces Health Services   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Forceps; Vacuum; Ventouse

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPISIOTOMY; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS HYPOXIA; FETUS OUTCOME; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL WELFARE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PERINEUM INJURY; PRIMIGRAVIDA; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAUDI ARABIA; STILLBIRTH; TREATMENT INDICATION; UMBILICAL CORD; VACUUM EXTRACTION;

ADULT; EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; OBSTETRICAL FORCEPS; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VACUUM EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL;

EID: 0036630149     PISSN: 03795284     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Midforceps delivery: A critical review
2. Alternative vacuum supplies for ventouse deliveries
3. Forceps and vacuum extraction
4. The vacuum extractor
5. Is the vacuum extractor really the instrument of first choice?
6. Instrumental delivery: A post art
7. Untersuchungen an einem neuen sugglockensystem mit kugelgelenk und abrisswarnug-in-vitro-studien und klinische anwendung
8. The place of midforceps deliveries in modern obstetric practice
9. The role of forceps in modern obstetrics
10. Vacuum extraction, bone injury and neonatal subgaleal bleeding
11. Assisted vaginal delivery using the vacuum extractor
12. Forceps or vacuum extraction? A comparison of effects on the newborn infant
13. Neonatal and maternal outcome in low pelvic and midpelvic operative deliveries
14. A comparison of the morbidity of midforceps and cesarean delivery