Biotic injuries on conifer seedlings planted in forest understory environments

New Forests

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-14

  Brandeis, Thomas J ^a   Newton, Michael ^a   Cole, Elizabeth C ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TROPICAL FORESTRY   (Puerto Rico)

Author keywords

Animal damage; Thinning; Underplanting; Understory; Vexar tubing

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; FUNGI; VEGETATION;

SEEDLINGS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

PEST DAMAGE; SEEDLING; SILVICULTURE; THINNING; UNDERSTORY;

ABIES; ABIES GRANDIS; ANIMALIA; CERVIDAE; CONIFEROPHYTA; CONIUM; CONIUM MACULATUM; FUNGI; MAMMALIA; ODOCOILEUS; ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS; ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS COLUMBIANUS; PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; RODENTIA; THUJA; THUJA PLICATA; TSUGA; TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA;

EID: 0036630092     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020553021748     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Black H.C., Dimlock E.J. II, Evans J. and Rochelle J.A. 1979. Animal damage to coniferous plantations in Oregon and Washington. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Res. Bull. 25.
2. Black H.C. 1992. Silvicultural Approaches to Animal Damage Management in Pacific Northwest Forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-287. USDA Forest Serv. Pacific NW Res. Sta., Portland, Oregon.
3. Borrecco J.E. 1972. The Response of Animals to Herbicide-induced Habitat Change, M.S. thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis 92 p.
4. Brandeis T.J., Newton M. and Cole E.C. 2001. Underplanted conifer seedlings survival and growth in thinned Douglas-fir stands. Can. J. Forest Res. 31: 302-312.
5. Cole E.C. 1996. Managing for mature habitat in production forests of western Oregon and Washington. Weed Technol. 10: 422-428.
6. Crouch G.L. 1966. Effects of simulated deer browsing on Douglas-fir seedlings. J. For. 64: 322-326.
7. Crouch G.L. 1980. Plastic Cages to Protect Douglas-fir Seedlings from Animal Damage in Western Oregon. Res. Pap. PNW-27. USDA Forest Serv., Pacific NW Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Portland, Oregon.
8. st Century. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 141-150.
9. deCalesta D.S. 1986. Southwest Oregon forest mammal pests. In: Helgerson O.T. (ed.), Forest Pest Management in Southwest Oregon. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis p 80., pp. 25-34.
10. Dodge W.E. and Borrecco J.E. 1992. Porcupines. In: Black H.C. (ed.), Silvicultural Approaches to Animal Damage Management in Pacific Nortwest Forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-287. USDA Forest Serv., Pacific NW Res. Sta., Portland, Oregon pp. 253-270.
11. Emmingham W.H., Bondi M. and Hibbs D.E. 1989. Underplanting western hemlock in a red alder thinning: Early survival, growth and damage. New Forests 3: 31-43.
12. Gourley M., Vomocil M. and Newton M. 1990. Forest weeding reduces the effect of deer-browsing on Douglas-fir. For. Ecol. Manage. 36: 177-185.
13. Howard K.M. and Newton M. 1984. Overtopping by successional coast-range vegetation slows Douglas-fir seedlings. J. Forestry 82: 178-180.
14. Ketchum J.S. 1995. Douglas-fir, Grand Fir and Plant Community Regeneration in Three Silvicultural Systems in Western Oregon, M.S., Oregon State University, Corvallis 111 p.
15. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W. and Wolfinger R.D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
16. McArdle R.E., Meyer W.H. and Bruce D. 1961. The yield of Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest. Tech. Bull. USDA, Washington, D.C. 201.
17. McComb W.C. and Hansen A.J. 1992. An introduction to forest wildlife ecology. In: Black H.C. (ed.), Silvicultural Approaches to Animal Damage Management in Pacific Northwest Forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-287. USDA Forest Serv., Pacific NW Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Portland, Oregon pp. 93-122. 93-122.
18. Newton M., Cole E.C. and Brandeis T. 1998. Use of broadcast pre-thinning treatment to facilitate two-storied stands 3rd International Conference on Forest Vegetation Management: Popular summaries. Ont. Min. Nat. Resour. Ont. For. Res. Inst., For. Res. Info. Pap. 141 (Wagner R.G., Thompson D.G.). pp. 226-228.
19. O'Dea M.E., Newton M., Cole E.C. and Gourley M. 2000. The influence of weeding on growth of browsed seedlings in Douglas-fir plantations. West. J. Appl. Forestry (in press).
20. Rochelle J.A. 1992. Deer and elk. In: Black H.C. (ed.), Silvicultural Approaches to Animal Damage Management in Pacific Northwest Forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-287. USDA Forest Serv., Pacific NW Res. Sta., Portland, Oregon pp. 333-350. 333-350.
21. Roth B.E. and Newton M. 1996a. Role of lammas growth in recovery of Douglas-fir seedlings from deer browsing, as influenced by weed control, fertilization and seed source. Can. J. Forest Res. 26: 936-944.
22. Roth B.E. and Newton M. 1996b. Survival and growth of Douglas-fir relating to weeding, fertilization, and seed source. West. J. Appl. Forestry 11: 62-69.
23. Schaap W. and Deyoe D. 1986. Seedling protectors for preventing deer browse. Res. Bull. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis 54.
24. Stein W.I. 1995. Ten-year Development of Douglas-fir and Associated Vegetation after Different Site Preparations on Coast Range Clearcuts. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-473. USDA Forest Serv., Pacific NW Forest and range exp. Sta., Portland, Oregon.
25. st Century. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 151-164.
26. Wagner R.G. and Radosevich S.R. 1991. Neighborhood predictors of interspecific competition in young Douglas-fir plantations. Can. J. Forest Res. 21: 821-828.
27. Ziller W.G. 1974. The tree rusts of western Canada. In: Dep. Environ. Can. For. Serv. Pub Vol. 1329., pp. 182-183.