Evaluating the internal consistency of recovery plans for federally endangered species

Ecological Applications

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 648-654

  Brigham, Christy A ^a   Power, Alison G ^b   Hunter, Alison ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Endangered species planning; Internal consistency; Monitoring; Multi species plans; Recovery plans; Single species plans

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; ENDANGERED SPECIES; MONITORING; RECOVERY PLAN;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036628164     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0648:ETICOR]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Blinne-Pike, L., and S. Mingus. 2000. The internal consistency of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory with adolescent mothers. Journal of Adolescence 23:107-111.
2. Duker, P. C. 1999. The verbal behavior assessment scale (VerBAS): construct validity; reliability, and internal consistency. Research in Developmental Disabilities 20(5):347-353.
3. Foin, T., S. Riley, A. Pawley, D. Ayres, T. Carlsen, P. Hodum, and P. Switzer. 1998. BioScience 48: 177-184.
4. Gustavsson, J. P., H. Bergman, G. Edman, L. Ekselius, L. von Knorring, and J. Linder. 2000. Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP): construction, internal consistency and normative data. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 102(3):217-225.
5. Hoekstra, J. M., J. A. Clark, W. F. Fagan, and P. D. Boersma. 2002. A comprehensive review of Endangered Species recovery plans. Ecological Applications 12:630-640.
6. Leonhard, C., K. Mulvey, D. Gastfriend, and M. Shwartz. 2000. The Addiction Severity Index, a field study of internal consistency and validity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 18(2):129-135.
7. NRC (National Research Council). 1995. Science and the Endangered Species Act. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., USA.
8. Schultz, C. B., and L. R. Gerber. 2002. Are recovery plans improving with practice? Ecological Applications 12:641-647.
9. Tear, T. J., J. M. Scott. P. H. Hayward, and B. Griffith. 1993. Status and prospects for success of the Endangered Species Act: a look at recovery plans. Science 262:976-977.
10. Tear, T., J. Scott, P. Hayward, and B. Griffith. 1995. Recovery plans and the Endangered Species Act: are criticisms supported by data? Conservation Biology 9:182-195.
11. Tsuji, T., M. Liu, S. Sonoda, K. Domen, and N. Chino. 2000. The stroke impairment assessment set: its' internal consistency and predictive validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81(7):863-868.
12. van Wijngaarden, B., A. H. Schene, M. Koeter, J. Vazquez-Barquero, H. Knudsen, A. Lasalvia, and P. McCrone. 2000. EPSILON study group caregiving in schizophrenia: development, internal consistency and reliability of the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire - European Version-EPSILON Study 4. British Journal of Psychiatry 177:S21-S27.