LCD versus CRT displays: A comparison of visual search performance for colored symbols

Human Factors

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 210-221

  Hollands, J G ^a   Parker, H A ^a   McFadden, S ^a   Boothby, R ^a  

^a DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATHODE RAY TUBES; CODES (SYMBOLS); COLOR CODES; HAPTIC INTERFACES; LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS;

VISUAL SEARCH PERFORMANCE;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

ARTICLE; COLOR; COMPUTER; LIQUID CRYSTAL; NAVY; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0036624715     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/0018720024497862     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Asian Technology Information Program. (2002). Introduction to Major Flat Panel Display Technologies [On-Line]. Tokyo: Author. Available: http://www.atip.or.jp/fpd/src/tutorial/fpd.html
2. Christ, R. E. (1975). Review and analysis of color-coding research for visual displays. Human Factors, 17, 542-570.
3. Hollands, J. G., McFadden. S., Cassidy, H. A., & Boothby, R. (2000). Visual search performance on LCD and CRT displays: An experimental comparison. In Society for Information Display (SID) International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers (pp. 292-295). San Jose, CA: Society for Information Display.
4. Luder, E. (1997). Active matrix addressing of LCDs: Merits and shortcomings. In L. W. MacDonald & A. C. Lowe (Eds.), Display Systems (pp. 157-172). London: Wiley.
5. Mackenzie, I. S., & Riddersma, S. (1994). Effects of output display and control-display gain on human performance in interactive systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 13, 328-337.
6. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection Theory: A User's Guide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Menozzi, M., Napflin, U., & Krueger. H. (1999). CRT versus LCD: A pilot study on visual performance and suitability of two display technologies for use in office work. Displays, 20, 3-10.
8. Nugent, W. A., Keating. R. L., & Campbell, N. L. (1995). Effects of Symbol Type, Selection Tool, and Information Density on Tactical Display Visual Search Performance (U.S. Navy Tech. Report 1691). San Diego. CA: Naval Command, Control and Ocean Surveillance Center, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Division.
9. Selhuber, L., & Parker, A. (1997). Optical characterisation of LCDs: Pitfalls and solutions. In L. W. MacDonald & A. C. Lowe (Eds.), Display Systems (pp. 289-306). London: Wiley.
10. Sola, K., Garner, K., & Mikulewicz, M. (1998). The Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) evaluation: A Performance Assessment by Military Users (NAWCADPAX - 98-79-TR). Patuxent River, MD: Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division.
11. Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command. (1991). STANAG 4420 Ratification Recommendations: Final Report. San Diego, CA: Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, Code 2441.
12. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
13. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
15. Wolfe, J. M. (1997). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-73). Hove, England: Psychology Press/Erlbaum.
16. Wright, S. L., Bailey, I. L., Tuan, K.-M., & Wacker, R. T. (1999). Resolution and legibility: A comparison of TFT-LCDs and CRTs. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 7, 253-256.