Effect of pectinase and cellulase addition on in vitro digestibility of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris);Efecto de la adición de una pectinasa y una celulasa sobre la digestibilidad in vitro del frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 151-154

  Víquez Rodríguez, Floribeth ^a   Bonilla Leiva, Ana Ruth ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE COSTA RICA   (Costa Rica)

Author keywords

Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris); Cellulase; In vitro digestibility; Pectinase

Indexed keywords

CELLULASE; POLYGALACTURONASE;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PH; PHASEOLUS VULGARIS; REACTION TIME; TEMPERATURE; VARIETAS;

CELLULASE; DIGESTION; FABACEAE; POLYGALACTURONASE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 0036623573     PISSN: 00040622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Tovar J. Bioavailability of carbohydrates in legumes: digestible and indigestible fractions. Arch Latinoamer. Nutr. 1994;44 (4-S): 36 S- 40 S.
2. Annison G & Topping DL Nutritional role of resistant starch: chemical structure and physiological function. Annu Rev Nutr. 1994;14: 297-320.
3. Nanna IA. & Phillips RD. Protein and starch digestibilty and flatulence potential of germinated cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata). J Food Sci. 1990;55(1): 151-153, 183.
4. Englyst HN & Cummings JH. Non starch polysaccharides (dietary fiber) and resistant starch. In New developments in dietary fiber. Furda, I. & Brine, C.J., eds. Plenum Press, New York. 1990;205-225.
5. Tomkinson RA. Studies on the indigestible and fermentable components of dry bean and cereal grains. Thesis M.Sc. Michigan State University, Deparment of Crop and Soil Science, Michigan. 1986;48-58.
6. Reddy NR, Pierson MD, Sathe SK & Salunkhe DK. Chemical, nutritional and physiological aspects of dry bean carbohydrates. A review. Food Chem. 1984;13:25-68.
7. Fleming SE. A study of relationships between flatus potential and carbohydrate distribution in legume seeds. J Food Sci. 1981;46:794-798.
8. Kellogg's. Importancia de la fibra. Dieta y Salud 1997;7 (1):1-16.
9. Gurr MI & Asp NG. 1994. Dietary Fiber. ILSI Europe Concise Monograph Series. ILSI Press. Washington, D.C. 23 p.
10. Kritchesky D. Cereal fiber and lipidemia. Cereal Foods World 1997;42 (2): 81-85.
11. Navarrete K. 1999. Evaluación del efecto del tamaño de partícula y cocción antes y después de la molienda del frijol Phaseolus vulgaris variedad Brunca, sobre la digestibilidad in vitro del almidón. Tesis Lic. en Tecnología de Alimentos. Universidad de Costa Rica, Facultad de Agronomía, San José. 36 p.
12. Chau CF & Cheung PCK. Effect of various processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro digestibility of protein and starch of two Chinese indigenous legume seeds. J Agr Food Chem. 1997;45(12): 4773-4776.
13. Barampama Z & Simard RE. Effects of soaking, cooking and fermentation on composition, in vitro starch digestibility and nutritive value of common beans. Plant Foods Human Nutr. 1995;418 (4): 349-365.
14. Marques MH, Casa Nova S, Fernández ML & Gomes AM. Insoluble dietary fiber of grain food legumes and protein digestibility. Arch Latinoamer Nutr. 1993;43(1): 66-72.
15. Borejszo Z & Khan K. Reduction of flatulence causing sugars by high temperature extrusion of pinto bean high starch fractions. J Food Sci. 1992;57(3): 771-777.
16. Kon S, Wagner JR, Becker R, Booth AN & Robbins DJ. Optimizing nutrient availability of legume food products. J Food Sci. 1971;36: 635-639.