Modeling sustained educational change with panel data: The case for dynamic multiplier analysis

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 85-103

  Kaplan, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic multipliers; Education policy; Linear statistical models

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036621086     PISSN: 10769986     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/10769986027002085     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Econometric analysis of panel data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Barcikowski, R. S. (1981). Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 267-285.
3. Bentler, P. M., & Freeman, E. H. (1983). Tests for stability in linear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 48, 143-145.
4. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
5. Ericsson, N. R. (1994). Testing exogeneity: An introduction. In N. R. Ericsson, & J. S. Irons. (Eds.), Testing exogeneity (pp. 3-38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Ericsson, N. R., & Irons, J. S. (Eds.). (1994). Testing exogeneity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Hendry, D. F. (1995). Dynamic econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Intriligator, M. D., Bodkin, R. G., & Hsiao, C. (1996). Econometric models, techniques, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Kaplan, D., Harik, P., & Hotchkiss. (2000). Cross-sectional estimation of dynamic structural equation models in disequilibrium. In R. Cudeck, S. H. C. du Toit, & D. Sorbom, (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future. A festschrift in honor of Karl G. Joreskog (pp. 315-339). Lincolnville, IL: Scientific Software International.
11. Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (1988). Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Miller, J. D., Hoffer, T., Sucher, R. W., Brown, K. G., & Nelson, C. (1992). LSAY code-book: Student, parent, and teacher data for 1992 cohort two for longitudinal years one through four (1987-1991). DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.
13. NCES. (1988). National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.
14. Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1991). Econometric models & economic forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2001). Hierarchical linear and non-linear modeling. Chicago: SSI International.
16. Richard, J. F. (1982). Exogeneity, causality, and structural invariance in econometric modeling. In G. C. Chow, & P. Corsi (Eds.), Evaluating the reliability of macro-economic models (pp. 105-118). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Schmidt, P. (1973). The asymptotic distribution of dynamic multipliers. Econometrica, 41(1), 161-164.
18. Sobel, M. E. (1990). Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 55, 495-515.
19. Spanos, A. (1986). Statistical foundations of econometric modeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.