Evaluating comprehensive tobacco control interventions: Challenges and recommendations for future action

Tobacco Control

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 140-145

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SMOKING; TOBACCO; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

GUIDELINES; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; SMOKING; TOBACCO; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

EID: 0036618340     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.2.140     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Georgia US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2000.
2. Murray DM. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials New York. Oxford University Press, 1998
3. Biglan A, Ary D, Wagnaar AC. The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community research. Prevention Science 2000,1.31-49.
4. McKinley JA Tale of 3 tails [editorial] Am J Public Health 1999;89:295-8
5. Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Fvers KE. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds Health behavior and health educations theory, research, and practice San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997.
6. Chaloupka FJ. ASSIST conceptual framework: state condition. National Cancer Institute, Working Paper, 1998.
7. Stillman FA, Hartman A, Graubard B, et al. The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study conceptual framework and evaluation design. Eval Rev 1999;23:259-80.
8. Gilpin EA, Stillman FA, Hartman AM, et al. Index for US State tobacco control initial outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:727-38.
9. Parker EA, Lichtenstein RL, Schulz AJ, et al. Disentangling measures of individual perceptions of community social dynamics: results of a community survey Health Education Behavior 2001;28:462-86.
10. Independent Evaluation Consortium. Final report of the independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Control Prevention and Education Program: Wave I Data, 1996-1997 Rockville, Maryland: The Gallup Organization, 1998
11. Fichtenberg C, Glantz S. Association of the California Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease. N Engl Med 2000;343:1772-7.
12. Parker EA, Schulz AJ, Israel BA, et al Detroit's east side village health worker partnership community-based lay health advisor intervention in an urban area. Health Education Behavior 1998;25:24-45.
13. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, et al. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 1998;19.173-202.
14. Levy D, Chaloupka F, Mendes D, et al. The use of simulation models for the surveillance, justification and understanding of tobacco control policies Paper prepared for evaluation workshop, January 2001.
15. Corrao MAQ, Guindon GE, Sharma N, et al Tobacco control country profiles Atlanta, Georgia American Cancer Society, 2000.