Thinking styles and academic achievement among filipino students

Journal of Genetic Psychology

Volumn 163, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 149-163

  Bernardo, Allan B I ^a   Zhang, Li Fang ^b   Callueng, Carmelo M ^a  

^a DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY   (Philippines)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Culture; Psychological tests; Thinking styles

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROL; CULTURAL FACTOR; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; PERSONALITY TEST; PHILIPPINES; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; STUDENT; THINKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MALE; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PHILIPPINES; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS; THINKING;

EID: 0036618062     PISSN: 00221325     EISSN: 19400896     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221320209598674     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Albaili, M. A. (1997). Differences among low-, average-and high-achieving college students on learning and study strategies. Educational Psychology, 17, 171-177.
2. Allport, G. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
3. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2000). Frameworks and contents of Philippine basic education textbooks: A synthesis and exposition. In F. H. Hornedo, V. A. Miralao, & F. P. Santa Maria (Eds.), The social and human sciences in Philippine basic education: A review of elementary and high school textbooks (pp. 1-24). Quezon City, Philippines: Philippine Social Science Council.
4. Bernardo, A. B. I. (in press). Filipino college math teachers' beliefs about learning and teaching: Reckoning with the school-mathematics and the inquiry-mathematics traditions. Learning Edge.
5. Bernardo, A. B. I., Clemena, R. M. S., & Prudente, M. S. P. (2000). The contexts and practices of science and mathematics education in the Philippines: Foundations of responsive science and mathematics teacher education programs. Manila, Philippines: Lasal-lian Institute for Development and Educational Research.
6. Biggs, J. B. (1989). Student's approaches to learning in Anglo-Chinese schools. Educational Research Journal, 4, 8-17.
7. Biggs, J. B. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. Educational Research Journal, 6, 27-30.
8. Dunn, R., Beaudry, J. S., & Klavas, A. (1989). Survey of research on learning styles. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 50-58.
9. Elequin, E. (1974). Educational goals, aims, and objectives (Tech. Rep. No. 114). Tokyo: National Institute for Educational Research, UNESCO-NIER Regional Programme for Educational Research in Asia.
10. Enriquez, V. G. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Press.
11. Grigorenko, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205-230). New York: Plenum Press.
12. Grigorenko, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic performance. Exceptional Children, 63, 295-312.
13. Helmke, A., & van Aken, M. A. G. (1995). The causal ordering of academic achievement and self concept of ability during elementary school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 624-637.
14. Hornedo, F. H., Miralao, V. A., & Santa Maria, F. P. (Eds.). (2000). The social and human sciences in Philippine basic education: A review of elementary and high school textbooks. Quezon City, Philippines: Philippine Social Science Council.
15. Kim, J., & Michael, W. B. (1995). The relationship of creativity measures to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 60-74.
16. Kwok, D. C., & Lytton, H. (1996). Perceptions of mathematics ability versus actual mathematics performance: Canadian and Hong Kong children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 209-222.
17. Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 41-54.
18. Messick, S. (1994). The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29, 121-136.
19. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
20. Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, A. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
21. Rayner, S., & Riding, R. J. (1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17, 5-27.
22. Riding, R. J. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 17, 29-50.
23. Riding, R. J., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles-An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
24. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
25. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197-224.
26. Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & P. Ruzgis (Eds.), Intelligence and personality (pp. 169-187). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1995). Styles of thinking in the school. European Journal for High Ability, 6, 201-219.
29. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52, 700-712.
30. Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1992). Thinking Styles Inventory. Unpublished test, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
31. Watkins, D. A. (1996). Learning theories and approaches to research: A cross-cultural perspective. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 3-24). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre and Melbourne: The Australian Council for Educational Research.
32. Witken, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Rasking, F., & Karp, S. A. (1971). Embedded Figures Test, Children '.v Embedded Figures Test, Group Embedded Figures Test. Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
33. Zhang, L. F., & Sachs, J. (1997). Assessing thinking styles in the theory of mental selfgovernment: A Hong Kong validity study. Psychological Reports, 81, 915-928.
34. Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Thinking styles, abilities, and academic achievement among Hong Kong university students. Educational Research Journal, 13, 41-62.
35. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202-231). New York: Cambridge University Press.