Lattice extraction of K→ππ amplitudes to O(p4) in chiral perturbation theory

Physical Review D

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2002, Pages

  Laiho, Jack ^a   Soni, Amarjit ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; KINEMATICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; THEORY; VELOCITY;

EID: 0036612837     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.114020     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. CP-PACS Collaboration, J. I. Noaki et al., hep-lat/0108013.
2. RBC Collaboration, T. Blum et al., hep-lat/0110075.
3. NA48 Collaboration, V. Fanti et al., Phys. Lett. B 465, 335 (1999).
4. KTeV Collaboration, A. Alavi-Harati et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 22 (1999).
5. For an attempt at K→ππ with staggered fermions and using lowest order ChPT, see D. Pekurovsky and G. Kilcup, Phys. Rev. D 64, 074502 (2001).
6. For a recent theoretical review see, G. Martinelli, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 106, 98 (2002).
7. C. Bernard, T. Draper, A. Soni, H. D. Politzer, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2343 (1985).
8. L. Maiani and M. Testa, Phys. Lett. B 245, 585 (1990).
9. V. Cirigliano and E. Golowich, Phys. Lett. B 475, 351 (2000);
10. Phys. Rev. D 65, 054014 (2002).
11. J. Bijnens, E. Pallante, and J. Prades, Nucl. Phys. B521, 305 (1998).
12. C. Bernard, T. Draper, G. Hockney, and A. Soni, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 4, 483 (1988).
13. C. Dawson et al., Nucl. Phys. B514, 313 (1998).
14. 4) see [6] and also for a specific recipe for the ΔI=3/2 case, see SPQcdR Collaboration, Ph. Boucaud et al., Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 106, 329 (2002).
15. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, L. Reina, and L. Silvestrini, Z. Phys. C 68, 239 (1995).
16. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
17. For a succinct introduction, see, H. Georgi, Weak Interactions and Modern Particle Theory (Benjamin/Cummings, New York, 1984).
18. See, e.g., M. Golterman and E. Pallante, hep-lat/0110206.
19. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142 (1984);
20. Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985).
21. J. Kambor, J. Missimer, and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B346, 17 (1990).
22. G. Ecker, J. Kambor, and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B394, 101 (1993);
23. see also E. Pallante, A. Pich, and I. Scimemi, Nucl. Phys. ibid. B617, 441 (2001).
24. J. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B. Holstein, Phys. Lett. 119B, 412 (1982).
25. Note also that in [13] a different recipe for the ΔI= 3/2 is used from the one advocated here; they are inserting momentum in K→ππ, whereas in our case momentum insertion is required only for K→π. In principle, using momentum insertion for both cases could enhance redundancy even further, although momentum insertion in K→ππ may well be somewhat harder.
26. M. Golterman and E. Pallante, hep-lat/0108029.
27. L. Lellouch and M. Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 219, 31 (2001);
28. see also C. J. D. Lin, G. Martinelli, C. T. Sachrajda, and M. Testa, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 109, 218 (2002).
29. M. Buchler, G. Colangelo, J. Kambor, and F. Orellana, Phys. Lett. B 521, 22 (2001);
30. G. Colangelo, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 100, 53 (2002).
31. Joachim Kambor, Ph.D. thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1990.
32. Carl Wolfe, Ph.D. thesis, York University, 1999.
33. R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991).
34. S. Wolfram, MATHEMATICA - A system for Doing Mathematics by Computer (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1988).
35. G. Passarino and M. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B160, 151 (1979).