Comparison of the isolated direct photon cross sections in pp̄ collisions at √s = 1.8 TeV and √s = 0.63 TeV

Physical Review D

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2002, Pages

  Acosta, D ^k   Affolder, T ^r   Akimoto, H ^aj   Albrow, M G ^j   Ambrose, D ^z   Amidei, D ^t   Anikeev, K ^s   Antos, J ^a   Apollinari, G ^j   Arisawa, T ^aj   Artikov, A ^h   Asakawa, T ^ai   Ashmanskas, W ^g   Azfar, F ^x   Azzi Bacchetta, P ^y   Bacchetta, N ^y   Bachacou, H ^r   Badgett, W ^j   Bailey, S ^o   De Barbaro, P ^ad   Barbaro Galtieri, A ^r   Barnes, V E ^ac   Barnett, B A ^q   Baroiant, S ^e   Barone, M ^l   Bauer, G ^s   Bedeschi, F ^aa   Belforte, S ^ah   Bell, W H ⁿ   Bellettini, G ^aa   Bellinger, J ^ak   Benjamin, D ⁱ   Bensinger, J ^d   Beretvas, A ^j   Berge, J P ^j   Berryhill, J ^g   Bhatti, A ^ae   Binkley, M ^j   Bisello, D ^y   Bishai, M ^j   Blair, R E ^b   Blocker, C ^d   Bloom, K ^t   Blumenfeld, B ^q   Blusk, S R ^ad   Bocci, A ^ae   Bodek, A ^ad   Bolla, G ^ac   Bonushkin, Y ^f   Bortoletto, D ^ac   Boudreau, J ^ab   Brandl, A ^v   Van Den Brink, S ^q   Bromberg, C ^u   Brozovic, M ⁱ   Brubaker, E ^r   Bruner, N ^v   Budagov, J ^h   Budd, H S ^ad   Burkett, K ^o   Busetto, G ^y   Byon Wagner, A ^j   Byrum, K L ^b   Cabrera, S ⁱ   Calafiura, P ^r   Campbell, M ^t   Carithers, W ^r   Carlson, J ^t   Carlsmith, D ^ak   Caskey, W ^e   Castro, A ^c   Cauz, D ^ah   Cerri, A ^aa   Chan, A W ^a   Chang, P S ^a   Chang, P T ^a   Chapman, J ^t   Chen, C ^z   Chen, Y C ^a   Cheng, M T ^a   Chertok, M ^e   Chiarelli, G ^aa   Chirikov Zorin, I ^h   Chlachidze, G ^h   Chlebana, F ^j   Christofek, L ^p   Chu, M L ^a   Chung, J Y ^w   Chung, W H ^ak   Chung, Y S ^ad   Ciobanu, C I ^w   Clark, A G ^m   Coca, M ^ad   Colijn, A P ^j   Connolly, A ^r   Convery, M ^ae   Conway, J ^af   Cordelli, M ^l   Cranshaw, J ^ag   more..

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (Taiwan)

^b ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^d BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^h JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH   (Russian Federation)

ⁱ DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^l INFN LABORATORI NAZIONALI DI FRASCATI   (Italy)

^m UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^o HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^q JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^r LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^s MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^t UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^u MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^v UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^w OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^x UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^y UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^z UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^aa SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE   (Italy)

^ab UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^ac PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ad UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^ae ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^af RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ag TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ah UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^ai UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^aj WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^ak UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENERGY; MASS; OSCILLATION; PHOTON; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SENSOR; THEORY;

EID: 0036612701     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.112003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. U. Baur et al., "Report of the Working Group on Photon and Weak Boson Production," hep-ph/0005226.
2. CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. D 48, 2998 (1993).
3. CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2734 (1992).
4. W. Vogelsang and A. Vogt, Nucl. Phys. B453, 370 (1995).
5. CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 271, 387 (1988), and the references therein. The angular coordinate system used within CDF is (θ, φ), where θ is the polar angle relative to the proton beam as measured from the event vertex, and φ the azimuth. The pseudorapidity is defined as η= - ln tan(θ/2).
6. D. Amidei et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 269, 51 (1988).
7. The trigger towers consist of two calorimeter towers in the central region, covering 0.1×15° in η-φ space. A typical CEM photon trigger cluster consists of one trigger tower, although neighboring trigger towers with more than 1 GeV can be added, as well as their neighbors.
8. This is a change from the level 2 configuration used in Ref. [3], in which a 5×5 array was used to isolate the photon.
9. A prescaled trigger is one in which every Nth event is recorded, where N is an integer, called the prescale factor.
10. The isolation cut used in this analysis measures energy in a cone of radius 0.4 around the photon candidate; a cone radius of 0.7 was used in Ref. [3].
11. Y.S. Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 815 (1974).
12. GEANT3 Collaboration, R. Brun et al., CERN DD/EE/84-1.
13. M. Gluck et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 388 (1994).
14. CTEQ Collaboration, H.L. Lai et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 12, 375 (2000).
15. The other parton distribution functions used for comparison were CTEQ5HJ [14], MRST-99 [16], and MRST-99 g ↑ [16].
16. A.D. Martin, R.G. Roberts, W.J. Stirling, and R.S. Thorne, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 79, 210 (1999).
17. DO Collaboration, B. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2786 (2000).
18. UA2 Collaboration, J. Alitti et al., Phys. Lett. B 263, 544 (1991).
19. D0 Collaboration, V.M. Abazov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 251805 (2001).
20. E. Laenen, G. Sterman, and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4296 (2000);
21. C. Fink, Ph.D. thesis, Florida State University, 2001, hep-ph/0105276.
22. D. Partos, Ph.D. thesis, Brandeis University, 2001.