Cervical cytologic reports of ASCUS and LSIL: Cyto-histological correlation and implication for management;Citologia cervicale ASCUS e LSIL: Correlazione cito-istologica e management

Minerva Ginecologica

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 263-269

  Fallani, M G ^a   Penna, C ^a   Fambrini, M ^a   Marchionni, M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cervix neoplasms, diagnosis; Cervix neoplasms, pathology; Colposcopy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; COLPOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CERVIX UTERI; COLPOSCOPY; CONIZATION; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERINE CERVICAL DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0036598502     PISSN: 00264784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Davey DD, Naryshkin S, Nielsen ML, Kline TS. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors. Diagn Cytopathol 1994;11:281-90.
2. Kurman RJ, Henson DE, Herbst AL, Noller KL, Schiffinan MH. Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology, JAMA 1994;271:1866-9.
3. Sidawy MK, Tabbara SO. Reactive change and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears: a cytohistologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:423-9.
4. National Cancer Institute Workshop. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: report of the 1991 Bethesda Workshop. JAMA 1992;267:1892.
5. Collins LC, Wang HH, Abu-Jawdeh GM. Qualifiers of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance help in patient management. Mod Pathol 1996;9: 677-81.
6. Sheils LA, Wilbur DC. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: stratification of the risk of association with or progression to squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization. Acta Cytol 1996;41:1056-72.
7. Auger M, Charbonneau M, Arseneau J. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a cytohistologic study of 52 cases. Acta Cytol 1997;41: 1671-5.
8. Kline M, Davey DD. Atypia squamous cells of undetermined significance qualified: a follow-up study. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;14:380-4.
9. Mody DR, Younes P, Schwartz MR, Spjut HJ, Ramzy I. Is there a case against qualifying ASCUS? Acta Cytol 1996;40:1022.
10. Selvaggi SM, Haefner HK. Reporting of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears: is it significant? Diagn Cytopathol 1995;13: 352-6.
11. Williams ML, Rimm DL, Perdigo MA, Frabe WJ. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: correlative histologic and follow-up studies from an Academic Medical Center. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:1-7.
12. Tabbara S, Saleh ADM, Anderson WA, Barber SR, Taylor PT, Crum CP. The Bethesda classification for squamous intraepithelial lesions: histologic, cytologic and viral correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:338-46.
13. Montz, FJ, Monk BJ, Fowler JM, Nguyen L. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:385-8.
14. Slawson DC, Bennet JH, Simon LJ, Herman JM. Should all women with cervical atypia be referred for colposcopy: a Harnet study. Harrisburgh Area Research Network. J Farn Pract 1994;38(4):387-92.
15. Gordon P, Hatch K. Survey of colposcopy practices by obstetricians and gynecologists. J Reprod Med 1992; 37:861-3.
16. Hall S, Wu TC, Soudi N, Sherman MF. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: cytologic predictors of biopsy confirmation. Diagn Cytopathol 1994;10(1):3-9.
17. Nasiell K, Roger V, Nasiell M. Behavior of mild cervical dysplasia during long term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 1986;61:609-14.
18. Mossetti C, De Palo G, Remotti G. Proposal for an unified Italian colposcopic classification. Minerva Ginecol 1987;39(3):99-106.
19. Hamou J. Microhysteroscopy. A new procedure and its original applications in gynecology. J Reprod Med 1981;26(7):375-82.
20. Baldauf JJ, Ritter J. Comparison of the risks of cytologic surveillance of women with atypical cells or low-grade abnormalities on cervical smear: review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 76(2):193-9.
21. Alanen KW. Elit LM, Molinaro PA, McLachlin CM. Assessment of cytologic followup as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Cancer 1998;84(1):1-4.
22. Cox JT, Lorincz AT, Schifftnan MH, Sherman ME, Cullen A, Kurman RJ. Human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture appears to be useful in triaging women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172(3):946-54.
23. Cuzick J, Szarewski A, Terry G, Ho L, Hanby A, Maddox P et al. Human papillomavirus testing in primaiy cervical screening. Lancet 1995;345(8964):1533-6.
24. Kuperman L, Krumholz BA. The triage of women with ASCUS cytology using human papillomavirus DNA testing. J Low Gen Tract Dis 2000;4(1):1-6.