Measuring the quality of cancer care: How do we judge 'appropriate' clinical practice?

Clinical Oncology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 217-218

  Macbeth, Fergus ^a  

^a VELINDRE CANCER CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PALLIATIVE THERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER REGISTRY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NON SMALL CELL CANCER; MEDICAL AUDIT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNITED KINGDOM; LUNG TUMOR; NOTE; PATIENT REFERRAL; RADIOTHERAPY; SMALL CELL CARCINOMA; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; CARCINOMA, SMALL CELL; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RADIOTHERAPY; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SCOTLAND;

EID: 0036597915     PISSN: 09366555     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/clon.2002.0096     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Factors influencing the use of thoracic radiotherapy in lung cancer-an analysis of the 1995 Scottish Lung Cancer Audit
2. Management and survival of lung cancer patients diagnosed in 1995 in Scotland: Results of a national, population-based study