A study of the factors that may affect the rehabilitation using the esophageal voice method in total laryngectomized;Estudio de posibles factores que influyen en la rehabilitación del laringuectomizado total mediante voz esofágica

Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 413-417

  Del Rio Valeiras M ^a,b   Martin Martin C ^b   Perez Carro Rios A ^b   Minguez Beltran I ^b   Rodriguez Martul C ^b   Bravo Juega, E ^b   Labella Caballero, T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b Pediatric Nutrition Research Group Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela   (Spain)

Author keywords

Esophageal voice; Speech rehabilitation; Total laryngectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESOPHAGUS SPEECH; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX DISORDER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPEECH REHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; EVALUATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; AGED; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LARYNGECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT DROPOUTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SPEECH, ESOPHAGEAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036595807     PISSN: 00016519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6519(02)78330-1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Labella T. Mecanismo productor de la fonación como soporte del lenguaje humano. Discurso pronunciado como Académico Electo en la Real Academia de Medicina y Cirugía de Galicia. La Coruña, Noviembre de 1995.
2. Blalock D. Speech rehabilitation after treatment of laryngeal carcinoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1997; 30(2): 179-88.
3. Sinard RJ, Netterville JL, Gaelyn Garret C, Ossoff RH. "Cancer of the Larynx" in Myers EN, Suen JY. (ed) Cancer of the Head and Neck. Philadelphia Saunders and Company 1996; pp 381-42.
4. Palop JM, Boti R, de Grado F, Nunez R, Schneider M, Bou R, Lasierra R. Complications of phonatory fistuloplasty. Case report. An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am 1998; 20(2): 191-7.
5. de Raucourt D, Rame JP, Daliphard F, Le Pennec D, Bequignon A, Luquet A. Voice rehabilitation with a voice prosthesis. Study of 62 patients with 5 years follow-up. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 1998; 119(5): 297-300.
6. Singer MI, Blom ED, Hamaker RC. Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. J Otolaryngol 1983; 12(5): 329-34.
7. Simpson CB, Postma GN, Stone RJ, Ossoff RH. Speech outcomes after laryngeal cancer management. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1997; 30(2):189-205.
8. Cullinan WL, Brown CS, Blalock PD. Ratings of the intelligibility of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech. J Commun Disord 1986; 19(3): 185-95.
9. Gates GA, Ryan W, Cooper JC. Lawlis GF, Cantu E, Hayashi T, Lauder E, Welch RW, Hearne E Current status of laryngectomee rehabilitation: I. Results of therapy. Am J Otolaryngol 1982; 3(1): 1-7.
10. Gates GA, Ryan W, Cantu E, Hearne E. Current status of laryngectomee rehabilitation: II. Causes of failure. Am J Otolaryngol 1982; 3(1): 8-14.
11. Hunt RB. Rehabilitation of the laryngectomees. Laryngoscope 1964; 74: 382-95.
12. Mjönes AB, Olofsson J, Danbolt C, Tibbling L. Oesophageal speech after laryngectomy: a study of possible influencing factors. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16 (5): 442-7.
13. Udaipurwala IH, Iqbal K, Farrukh S, Jalisi M. Oesophageal speech: The cheapest method of voice restoration after laryngectomy. Pakistan Journal of Otolaryngology 1993; 9: 127-30.