Constructing representations of Karl Spencer Lashley

Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 225-245

  Dewsbury, Donald A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; GENETICS; HISTORY; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

BEHAVIOR; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; PREJUDICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036593209     PISSN: 00225061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.10060     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Barkan, E. (1992). The retreat of scientific racism: Changing concepts of race in Britain and the United States between the world wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bartlett, F. C. (1960). Karl Spencer Lashley 1890-1958. Biographical memoirs of fellows of the Royal Society, 5, 107-118.
3. Beach, F. A. (1961). Karl Spencer Lashley 1890-1958. Biographical memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 35, 163-204.
4. Beach, F. A., Hebb, D. O., Morgan, C. T., & Nissen, H. W. (1960). The neuropsychology of Lashley. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Bowler, P. J. (1983). [Review of D. A. MacKenzie's Statistics in Britain]. Isis, 74, 586-588.
6. Bruce, D. (1991), Integrations of Lashley. In G. A. Kimble, M. Wertheimer, & C. White (Eds.) Portraits of pioneers in psychology (pp. 307-323). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bruce, D. (1994). Lashley and the problem of serial order. American Psychologist, 49, 93-103.
8. Bruce, D. (1998a). The Lashiey-Hull debate revisited. History of Psychology, 1, 69-84.
9. Bruce, D. (1998b). Lashley's rejection of connectionism. History of Psychology, 1, 160-164.
10. Bruce, D. (2000). [Review of N. M. Weidman's Constructing scientific psychology: Karl Lashley's mind-brain debates.] Isis, 91, 824-825.
11. Carmichael, L. (1959). Karl Spencer Lashley, experimental psychologist. Science, 129, 1410-1412.
12. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Desmond, A., & Moore, J. (1991). Darwin. New York: Time Warner.
14. Dewsbury, D. A. (1993). The boys of summer at the end of summer: The Watson-Lashley correspondence of the 1950s. Psychological Reports, 72, 263-269.
15. Diehl, L. A. (1986). The paradox of G. Stanley Hall: Foe of coeducation and educator of women. American Psychologist, 41, 868-878.
16. Dunlap, K. (1930). Psychological hypotheses concerning the functions of the brain. Scientific Monthly, 31, 99-112.
17. Fancher, R. E. (1983). Francis Gallon's African ethnography and its role in the development of his psychology. British Journal for the History of Science, 16, 67-79.
18. Furumoto, L. (1989). The new history of psychology. In I. S. Cohen (Ed.), The G. Stanley Hall lecture series v.9 (pp. 9-34). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Geison, G. L. (1995). The private science of Louis Pasteur. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Geison, G. L. (1996). Pasteur and the culture wars: An exchange. New York Review of Books, April 4, 68-69.
21. Grene, M. (1993). Recent biographies of Darwin: The complexity of context. Perspectives on Science, 1, 659-675.
22. Guthrie, R. V. (1998). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology (2nd ed.). Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon
23. Hebb, D. O. (1959). Karl Spencer Lashley: 1890-1958. American Journal of Psychology, 72, 142-149.
24. Heidbreder, E. (1958) [Letter to Claire Schiller Lashley, October 29]. Obtained from Christina Schlusemeyer and now housed in the Lashley papers at the Smathers Library, University of Florida.
25. Landis, C. (1958). [Letter to D. O. Hebb]. Box M91, archives of the History of American Psychology, University of Akron, Akron OH.
26. Lashley, K. S. (1917). Modifiability of the preferential use of the hands in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Animal Behavior, 7, 178-186.
27. Lashley, K. S. (1923). The behavioristic interpretation of consciousness I and II. Psychological Review, 30, 237-272, 329-353.
28. Lashley, K. S. (1929). Brain mechanisms and intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Lashley, K. S. (1931). Cerebral control versus reflexology: A reply to Professor Hunter. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 3-20.
30. Lashley, K. S. (1938). Experimental analysis of instinctive behavior. Psychological Review, 45, 445-471.
31. Lashley, K. S. (1941). [Letter to R. F. Griggs, October 30]. Papers of the Committee on Human Heredity, National Research Council Archives, Washington DC.
32. Lashley, K. S. (1945). [Letter to T. G. Andrews, June 13]. Obtained from the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, now housed in the Papers of the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, Woodruff Library, Emory University, Atlanta GA.
33. Lashley, K. S. (1946). James Arthur lecture. Obtained from Christina Schlusemeyer and now housed in the Lashley papers at the Smathers Library, University of Florida.
34. Lashley, K. S. (1947). Structural variation in the nervous system in relation to behavior. Psychological Review, 54, 325-334.
35. Lashley, K. S. (1949). Persistent problems in the evolution of mind. Quarterly Review of Biology, 24, 28-42.
36. Lashley, K. S. (1950). In search of the engram. In J. F. Danielli, and R. Brown (Eds.), Physiological mechanisms in animal behaviour (pp. 454-482). New York: Academic Press.
37. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112-136). New York: Wiley.
38. Lashley, K. S. (1952). [Autobiographical statement]. Anne Roe papers. Archives of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia PA.
39. Lashley, K. S. (1953). Twenty-fourth annual report of the Yerkes laboratory for Primate Biology, Inc. Obtained from the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, now housed in the Papers of the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, Woodruff Library, Emory University, Atlanta GA.
40. Lashley, K. S. (1955). [Letter to John B. Watson, October 27]. Obtained from Christina Schlusemeyer and now housed in the Lashley papers at the Smathers Library, University of Florida.
41. Lashley, K. S. (1956). [Letter to Heinrich Klüver, January 2]. Obtained from Christina Schlusemeyer and now housed in the Lashley papers at the Smathers Library, University of Florida.
42. Lashley, K. S., Chow, K. L., & Semmes, J. (1951). An examination of the electrical field theory of cerebral integration. Psychological Review, 58, 123-136.
43. MacKenzie, D. A. (1981). Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930: The social construction of scientific knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
44. Orbach, J. (1982). Neuropsychology after Lashley: Fifty years since the publication of Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Orbach, J. (1998). The neuropsychological theories of Lashley and Hebb. Lanham MD: University Press of America.
46. Perutz, M. R. (1995). The pioneer defended. New York Review of Books, February 21, 54-58.
47. Perutz, M. R. (1996). Pasteur and the culture wars: An exchange. New York Review of Books, April 4, 69.
48. Pollard, R. (1994). [Interview with Donald A. Dewsbury and Rene Wilkie], Orange Park FL.
49. Porter, T. M. (1981). Social interests and statistical theory. Science, 214, 784.
50. Pribram, K. H. (1993) [Interview with Donald A. Dewsbury, April 23], Clearwater FL.
51. Richards, O. (1997). 'Race', racism and psychology: Towards a reflexive history. London: Routledge.
52. Roe, A. (1952a). [Lashley folder]. Anne Roe papers. Philadelphia: Archives of the American Philosophical Society. [Note that although the Summary is dated March, 1952, the interview probably occurred in 1950].
53. Roe, A. (1952b). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.
54. Roe, A. (1952c). Analysis of group Rorschachs of psychologists and anthropologists. Journal of Projective Techniques, 16, 212-214.
55. Roe, A. (1953). A psychological study of eminent psychologists and anthropologists, and a comparison with biological and physical scientists. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 67(2) (Whole no. 352). 1-55.
56. Ruse, M. (1993). Will the real Charles Darwin please stand up? Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 225-231.
57. Slapin, S. (1996). [Review of G. L. Geison's The private science of Louis Pasteur]. Philosophy of Science, 63, 482-483.
58. Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410-429.
59. Toulmin, S. (1977). From form to function: Philosophy and history of science in the 1950s and now. Daedalus, 106, 143-162.
60. Tucker, W. H. (1994). The science and politics of racial research. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.
61. Warner, J. H. (1996). [Review of G. L. Geison's The private science of Louis Pasteur]. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 70, 718-720.
62. Weidman, N. M. (1994a). Of rats and men: Karl Lashley and American psychology, 1912-1955. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca NY.
63. Weidman, N. (1994b). Mental testing and machine intelligence: The Lashley-Hull debate. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 30, 162-180.
64. Weidman, N. (1996). Psychobiology, progressivism, and the anti-progressive tradition. Journal of the History of Biology, 29, 267-308.
65. Weidman, N. (1998). A response to Bruce (1998) on the Lashley-Hull debate. History of Psychology, 1, 156-159.
66. Weidman, N. M. (1999). Constructing scientific psychology: Karl Lashley's mind-brain debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Winston, A. S. (1998). Science in the service of the far right: Henry E. Garrett, the IAAEE, and the Liberty Lobby. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 179-210.
68. Yee, A. H., Fairchild, H. H., Weizmann, F., & Wyatt, G. E. (1993). Addressing psychology's problems with race. American Psychologist, 48, 1132-1140.