Variation in patient-reported quality among health care organizations

Health Care Financing Review

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 85-100

  Solomon, Loel S ^a   Zaslavsky, Alan M ^a   Landon, Bruce E ^a   Cleary, Paul D ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; MANAGED CARE; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAPITATION FEE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GROUP PRACTICE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RISK MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CAPITATION FEE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GROUP PRACTICE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT PRACTICE ASSOCIATIONS; MALE; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; MASSACHUSETTS; MIDDLE AGE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; RISK SHARING, FINANCIAL; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0036591512     PISSN: 01958631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. National Committee on Quality Assurance Health-Plan Accreditation: Predictors, correlates of performance, and market impact
2. Controlling variation in health care: A consultation from walter shewhart
3. How do purchasers develop and use performance measures?
4. Foreword on the consumer assessment of health plans study
5. Performance reports on quality: Prototypes, problems and prospects
6. Effectiveness in professional organizations: The impact of surgeons and surgical staff organization on the quality of care in hospitals
7. Processional power and professional effectiveness: The power of the surgical staff and the quality of surgical care in hospitals
8. Medicare managed care CAHPS®: A tool for performance improvement
9. Psychometric properties of the CAHPS® 1.0 survey measures
10. Contractual arrangements between HMOs and primary care physicians: Three-tiered HMOs and risk pools
11. The effects of medical group practice organizational factors on physicians' use of resources
12. The organizational structure of medical group practices in managed care environment
13. A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care
14. A model of rural health care: Consumer response among users of the marshfield clinic
15. Implementing clinical practice guidelines. Social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change
16. Managed care and physician/hospital integration
17. Issues of variability and bias affecting multi-site measurement of quality of care
18. Consistency in performance among primary care physicians
19. Consolidation of medical groups into physician practice management organizations
20. The impact of organization of practice on quality of care and physician productivity
21. Patient's ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings: Results from the medical outcomes study
22. Primary care performance in prepaid and fee-for-service settings: Results from the medical outcomes study
23. Health plan report cards: Exploring differences in plan ratings
24. National quality monitoring of medicare health plans: The relationship between enrollees' reports and the quality of clinical care
25. Evaluating the physician office visit: In pursuit of a valid and reliable measure of quality improvement efforts
26. The new world of managed care: Creating organized delivery systems
27. Hospital medical staff organization and quality of care: Results for myocardial infarction and appendectomy
28. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability
29. The new structure of individual practice associations
30. How consumer assessment of managed care vary within and between markets
31. Dimensions of consumer-assessed quality of medicare managed-care health plans
32. Adjusting performance measures to ensure equitable plan comparisons