Effect of NaCl and high pH on seedling growth of 15 Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. provenances

New Forests

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 193-206

  Marcar, Nico E ^a   Zohar, Yale ^b   Guo, Jianmin ^a   Crawford, Debbie F ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Alkalinity; Eucalyptus camaldulensis; Genotypic variation; Salinity

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; FORESTRY; PH EFFECTS; PLANT CELL CULTURE; REDUCTION; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

DRY WEIGHT;

SEED;

GROWTH; PH; SEEDLING; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS CAMALDULENSIS; VICTORIA;

EID: 0036588590     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020334418883     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arnold R., Harwood C., Matheson C. and Spencer D. 2000. Choice of species and opportunities for genetic improvement. In: Nambiar S., Cromer R. and Brown A. (eds), Restoring Tree Cover to the Murray-Darling Basin. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Canberra, pp. 13-20.
2. Aswathappa N., Marcar N.E. and Thomson L.A.J. 1987. Salt tolerance of Australian tropical and subtropical acacias. In: Turnbull J.W. (ed.), Australian Acacias in Developing Countries. ACIAR Proceedings No. 16. ACIAR, Canberra, pp. 70-73.
3. Bell D.T., Wilkins C.F., van der Moezel P.G. and Ward S.C. 1993. Alkalinity tolerance of woody species used in bauxite waste rehabilitation, Western Australia. Restor. Ecol. 51-58.
4. Bennett D.L. and George R.J. 1996. River red gums (E. camaldulensis) for farm forestry on saline and waterlogged land in south-western catchments of Western Australia? Proceedings of 4th National Conference and Workshop on the 'Productive Use and Rehabilitation of Saline Lands', Albany, Western Australia, 25-30 March 1996. Promaco Conventions Pty Ltd., Canning Bridge, WA, Australia, pp. 345-358.
5. Dudal R. and Purnell M.F. 1986. Land resources: salt affected soils. Reclam. Reveg. Res. 5: 1-10.
6. Eldridge K.G., Davidson J., Harwood C.E. and Van Wyk G. 1993. Eucalypt Domestication and Breeding. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 288 p.
7. Emery B.M. and Ledig F.T. 1987. Provenance variation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. in California. Silvae Genetica 36: 172-180.
8. Mahmood K., Marcar N.E., Naqvi M.H., Arnold R.J., Crawford D.F., Iqbal S. et al. 2002. Genetic variation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. for growth and stem straightness in a provenance-family trial on saltland in Pakistan. Forest Ecology and Management (in press).
9. Marcar N.E. 1993. Waterlogging modifies growth, water use and ion concentrations in seedlings of salt-treated Eucalyptus camaldulensis, E. tereticornis, E. robusta and E. globulus. Aust. J. Plant Physiol 20: 1-13.
10. -. Plant Soil 125: 245-254.
11. Marcar N.E. and Khanna P.K. 1997. Reforestation of salt-affected and acid soils. In: Nambiar E.K.S. and Brown A.G. (eds), Management of Soil, Nutrients and Water in Tropical Plantation Forests. ACIAR Monograph No. 43. Canberra, Australia, pp. 481-524.
12. Marcar N.E., Crawford D.F., Leppert P.M., Jovanovic T., Floyd R. and Farrow R. 1995. Trees for Saltland: A Guide to Selecting Native Species for Australia. CSIRO Publications, Melbourne, 72 p.
13. Marcar N.E. and Arnold R.J. 1999. Selection and improvement of eucalypts and acacias for salt and waterlogging tolerance. In: Arain M.A., Ahmad M., Naqvi S.S.M. and Ashraf M. (eds), New Genetical Approaches to Crop Improvement. Third International Symposium. Tando Jam, Pakistan, pp. 217-230.
14. Marcar N.E., Guo J. and Crawford D.F. 1999. Response of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh, E. globulus Labill. ssp. globulus and E. grandis W. Hill to excess boron and sodium chloride. Plant Soil 208: 251-257.
15. Marschner H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, 889 p.
16. Midgley S.J., Eldridge K.G. and Doran J.C. 1989. Genetic resources of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Common. For. Rev. 68: 295-308.
17. Payne R.W., Lane P.W., Ainsley A.E., Bicknell K.E., Digby P.G.N., Harding S.A. et al. 1987. Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Oxford University Press, New York, 749 p.
18. Qureshi R.H. and Barrett-Lennard E.G. 1998. Saline Agriculture for Irrigated Land in Pakistan: a Handbook. ACIAR, Canberra, 142 p.
19. Sands R. 1981. Salt resistance in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. from three different seed sources. Aust. For. Res. 11: 93-100.
20. Thomson L.A.J., Morris J.D. and Halloran G.M. 1987. Salt tolerance in eucalypts. In: Rana R.S. (ed.), Afforestation of Salt-Affected Soils. Proceedings International Symposium, Volume 3. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, India 3:, pp. 1-12.
21. van der Moezel P.G., Watson L.E. and Bell D.T. 1989. Gas exchange responses of two Eucalyptus species to salinity and waterlogging. Tree Physiol 5: 251-257.
22. -. Plant Soil 125: 39-47.
23. Zohar Y. and Schiller G. 1998. Growth and water use by selected seed sources of Eucalyptus under high water table and saline conditions. Agric. Ecosys. Environ 69: 265-277.