Stimulation of somatic embryo formation by mutagens and darkness in culture of immature zygotic embryos of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.

Plant Growth Regulation

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 93-98

  Gaj, Malgorzata D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

Author keywords

Direct somatic embryogenesis; EMS; Immature zygotic embryo culture; In vitro culture of A. thaliana; MNH; Mutagensis of explants; Stimulation of somatic embryogenesis

Indexed keywords

FREQUENCIES; LIGHT; MUTAGENS;

SOMATIC EMBRYO;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 0036587527     PISSN: 01676903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020392014493     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ahloowalia B.S. 1998. In-vitro techniques and mutagensis for the improvement of vegetatively propagated plants. In: Jain S.M., Brar D.S. and Ahloowalia B.S. (eds), Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp. 16-37.
2. Alonso-Blanco C. and Koornneef M. 2000. Naturally occuring variation in Arabidopsis: an underexploited resource for plant genetics. Trends Plant Science 5: 22-29.
3. Bean S.J., Gooding P.S., Mullineaux P.M. and Davies D.R. 1997. A simple system for pea transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 16: 513-519.
4. Bevan M. and Murphy G. 1999. The small, the large and the wild: the value of comparison in plant genomics. Trends Genet. 15: 211-214.
5. Brown S.D.M. and Peters J. 1996. Combining mutagensis and genomics in the mouse - closing the phenotype gap. Trends Genet. 12: 433-435.
6. D'Onofrio C.D., Morini S. and Bellocchi G. 1998. Effect of light quality on somatic embryogenesis in quince leaves. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Cult. 53: 91-98.
7. Deane C.R., Fuller M.P. and Dix P.J. 1995. Selection of hydroxyproline-resistant proline-accumulating mutants of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis). Euphytica 85: 329-334.
8. Duncan R.R. 1997. Tissue culture induced variation in crop improvement. In: Sparks D.L. (ed.), Advances in Agronomy. Academic Press, pp. 201-240.
9. Encheva J., Ivanov P., Tsvetkova F. and Nikolova V. 1993. Development of a new initial breeding material in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) using direct organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis. Euphytica 68: 181-185.
10. Gaj M.D. 2001a. Direct somatic embryogenesis as a rapid and efficient system for in vitro regeneration of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Cult. 64: 39-46.
11. Gaj M.D. 2001b. Regeneration of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.), Heynh. Biotechnologia 53: 90-98.
12. Gamborg O.L., Miller R.A. and Ojima K. 1968. Nutrient requirement of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151-158.
13. Kiyosue T., Satoh S., Kamada H. and Harada H. 1993. Somatic embryogenesis in higher plants. J. Plant Res. 3: 75-82.
14. Leopold A.C. and Kriedemann P.E. 1975. Plant Growth and Development. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, Tokyo, Toronto, 322-325 pp.
15. Litz R.E. and Gray D. 1992. Organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis. In: Hammerschlag F.A. and Litz R.E. (eds), Biotechnology of Perennial Fruit Crops. CAB International, University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 3-34.
16. Luo Y. and Koop H.S. 1997. Somatic embryogenesis in cultured immature zygotic embryos and leaf protoplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. Planta 202: 387-396.
17. MacDonald M.V. and Aslam F.N. 1986. The effect of gamma irradiation on buds of Brassica napus ssp. Cruciferae Newsletter 11: 90-95.
18. Maluszynski M., Szarejko l. and Sigurbjrnsson B. 1996. Haploids and mutation techniques. In: Jain S.M., Sopory S.K. and Veilleux R.E. (eds), In vitro Haploid Production in Higher Plants. Kluwer Acad Publ, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp. 67-93.
19. Maluszynski M. 1998. Crop germplasm enhancement through mutation techniques. In: Rutger J.N., Robinson J.F. and Dilday R.H. (eds), Proc Int. Symp: Rice Germplasm Evaluation and Enhancement, August 30-September 2, 1998. Stuttgart, Arkansas, pp. 74-82.
20. Mordhorst A.P., Voerman K.J., Hartog M.V., Meijer E.A., VanWent J., Koornneef M. et al. 1998. Somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana is facilitated by mutation in genes repressing meristematic cell divisions. Genetics 149: 549-563.
21. Pius J., George L., Eapen S. and Rao P.S. 1994. Evaluation of somaclonal and mutagen induced variation in fingermillet. Plant Breed 112: 239-243.
22. Raemakers C.J.J.M., Jacobsen E. and Visser R.G.F. 1995. Secondary somatic embryogenesis and applications in plant breeding. Euphytica 81: 93-107.
23. Tautorus T.E., Fowke L.C. and Dunstan D.I. 1991. Somatic embryogenesis in conifers. Can. J. Bot. 69: 1873-1899.
24. Tisserat B., Esan E.B. and Murashige T. 1979. Somatic embryogenesis in angiosperms. Horicultural Reviews 1: 1-78.
25. Touraev A., Vicente O. and Heberle-Bors E. 1997. Initiation of microspore embryogenesis by stress. Trends in Plant Science 8: 297-302.
26. van Harten A.M. 1998. Mutation Breeding. Theory and Practical Application. Cambridge University Press.
27. Vasil I.K. 1988. Progress in regeneration and genetic manipulation of cereal crops. Biotechnology 6: 397-402.
28. Wu Y., Haberland G., Zhou C. and Koop H.U. 1992. Somatic embryogenesis, formation of morphogenic callus and normal development in zygotic embryos of Arabidopsis thaliana in vitro. Protoplasma 169: 89-96.
29. Zaki M. and Dickinson H.G. 1995. Modification of cell development in vitro. The effect of colchicine on anther and isolated microspore culture in Brassica napus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 40: 225-270.
30. Zapata F.J. and Aldemita R.R. 1989. Induction of salt tolerance in high-yielding rice varieties through mutagensis and anther culture. In: Maluszynski M. (ed.), Current Options for Cereal Improvement. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp, 193-202.
31. Zelena E. 2000. The effect of light on metabolism of IAA in maize seedlings. Plant Growth Regulation 30: 23-29.
32. Zimmerman L. 1993. Somatic embryogenesis: a model for early development in higher plants. Plant Cell 5: 1411-1423.