Small mammal habitat associations at patch and landscape scales in Oregon

Forest Science

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 255-264

  Martin, Karl J ^a   McComb, William C ^a  

^a WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Composition; Forest; Pattern; Richness

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COASTAL ZONES;

LANDSCAPES;

FORESTRY;

CONIFEROPHYTA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 0036587450     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. BAILEY, B.J.R. 1980. Large sample simultaneous confidence intervals for the multinomial probabilities based on transformation of the cell frequencies. Technometrics 22:583-589.
2. BLOCK, W.M., M.L MORRISON, AND P.E. SCOTT. 1998. Development and evaluation of habitat models for herpetofauna and small mammals. For. Sci. 44:430-437.
3. BROOKS, J.P. 1997. Bird-habitat relationships at multiple spatial resolutions in the Oregon Coast Range. M.Sc. thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 46 p.
4. BROWN, E.R. 1985. Management of wildlife and fish habitats in forests of western Oregon and Washington. USDA For. Serv. R6-F&WL-192.
5. BROWN, E.R., AND A.B. CURTIS. 1985. Introduction. P. 1-15 in Management of wildlife fish habitats in forests of Western Oregon and Washington, Brown, E.R. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. R6-F & WL-192.
6. BURY, R.B. 1983. Differences in amphibian populations in logged and old-growth redwood forest. Northwest Sci. 57:167-178.
7. BURY, R.B., AND P.S. CORN. 1987. Evaluation of pitfall trapping in northwestern forests: trap arrays with drift fences. J. Wildl. Manage. 51:112-119.
8. CAREY, A.B., AND M.L. JOHNSON. 1995. Small mammals in managed, naturally young, and old-growth forests. Ecol. Applic. 5:336-352.
9. CHERRY, S. 1996. A comparison of confidence interval methods for habitat use-availability studies. J. Wildl. Manage. 60:653-658.
10. COHEN, W.B., T.A. SPIES, AND M. FIORELLA. 1995. Estimating the age and structure of forests in a multi-ownership landscape of western Oregon, USA. Internat. J. Rem. Sens. 16:721-746.
11. COLLINS, S.L., S.M. GLENN, AND D.J. GIBSON. 1995. Experimental analysis of intermediate disturbance and initial floristic composition: decoupling cause and effect. Ecology 76:486-492.
12. CONNELL, J.H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302-1310.
13. CORN, P.S., AND R.B. BURY. 1991. Small mammal communities in the Oregon Coast Range. P. 241-255 in Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir forests, Ruggerio, L.F., et al. (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-285.
14. FORMAN, R.T.T., AND M. GODRON. 1986. Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York. 619 p.
15. FORSMAN, E.D., E.C. MESLOW, AND M.J. STRAUB. 1977. Spotted owl abundance in young versus old-growth forests, Oregon. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 5:43-47.
16. FORSMAN, E.D., E.C. MESLOW, AND H.M. WIGHT. 1984. Distribution and biology of the spotted owl in Oregon. Wildl. Monogr. 87. 64 p.
17. FRANKLIN, J.F., AND C.T. DYRNESS. 1973. Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-80.
18. FRANKLIN, J.F., AND R.T.T. FORMAN. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles. Landsc. Ecol. 1:5-18.
19. GEORGE, S.B. 1989. Sorex trowbridgii. Mammal. Spec. 337:1-5.
20. GILLESBERG, A.M., AND A.B. CAREY. 1991. Arboreal nests of Phenacomys longicaudus in Oregon. J. Mammal. 72:784-787.
21. GOLDSTEIN, P.Z. 1999. Functional ecosystems and biodiversity buzzwords. Conserv. Biol. 13:247-255.
22. GOMEZ, D.M. 1992. Small mammal and herpetofauna abundance in riparian and upslope areas of five forest conditions. M.Sc. thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 118 p.
23. GOMEZ, D.M., AND R.G. ANTHONY. 1996. Amphibian and reptile abundance in riparian and upslope areas of five forest types in western Oregon. Northwest Sci. 70:109-119.
24. HALL, F.C., L.W. BREWER, J.F. FRANKLIN, AND R.L. WERNER. 1985. Plant communities and stand conditions. P. 17-32 in Management of wildlife and fish habitats in forests of Western Oregon and Washington, Brown, E.R. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. No. R6-F & WL-192-1985.
25. HARRIS, L.D. 1984. The fragmented forest: island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 211 p.
26. HAYES, J.P., S.P. CROSS, AND P.W. MCINTIRE. 1986. Seasonal variation in mycophagy by the western red-backed vole, Clethrionomys californicus, in Southwest Oregon. Northwest Sci. 60:250-257.
27. HUSTON, M. 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am. Natur. 113:81-101.
28. IMPARA, P.C. 1997. Spatial and temporal patterns of fire in the forests of the central Oregon Coast Range. Diss., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 354 p.
29. JOHNSON, D.H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65-71.
30. MARCOT, B.G., AND J.W. THOMAS. 1997. Of spotted owls, old growth, and new policies: A history since the Interagency Scientific Committee report. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-408.
31. MCCOMB, W.C., R.G. ANTHONY, AND K. MCGARIGAL. 1991. Differential vulnerability of small mammals and amphibians to two trap types and two trap baits in Pacific Northwest Forests. Northwest Sci. 65:109-115.
32. MCGARIGAL, K., AND W.C. MCCOMB. 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon Coast Range. Ecol. Monogr. 65:236-260.
33. MEISELMAN, N., AND A.T. DOYLE. 1996. Habitat and microhabitat use by red tree voles (Phenacomys longicaudus). Am. Midl. Natur. 135:33-42.
34. MERRIAM, G. 1995. Movement in spatially divided populations: Responses to landscape structure. P. 64-77 in Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation, Lidicker, W.Z., Jr. (ed.). Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. 215 p.
35. MILLS, L.S. 1995. Edge effects and isolation: red-backed voles on forest remnants. Conserv. Biol. 2:395-403.
36. MORRISON, M.L., B.G. MARCOT, AND R.W. MANNAN. 1992. Wildlife habitat relationships: Concepts and applications. The Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. 344 p.
37. PETERSON, G., C.R. ALLEN, AND C.S. HOLLING. 1998. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1:6-18.
38. ROSENBERG, D.K., K.A. SWINDLE, AND R.G. ANTHONY. 1994. Habitat associations of California red-backed voles in young and old-growth forests in western Oregon. Northwest Sci. 84:266-272.
39. SMITH, D.E., B.C. LARSON, M.J. KELTY, AND P.M.S. ASHTON. 1996. The practice of silviculture: Applied forest ecology. Ed. 9. Wiley, New York. 537 p.
40. SONGER, M.A., M.V. LOMOLINO, AND D.R. PERAULT. 1997. Niche dynamics of deer mice in a fragmented, old-growth landscape. J. Mammal. 78:1027-1039.
41. SPIES, T.A., AND S.P. CLINE. 1988. Coarse woody debris in forests and plantations of coastal Oregon. P. 5-24 in From the forest to the sea: A story of fallen trees, Maser, C., et al. (eds.).USDA For. Serv. Tech. Rep. PNW-229.
42. SPIES, R.A., J.F. FRANKLIN, AND T.B. THOMAS. 1988. Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69:1689-1702.
43. SPIES, T.A. AND M.G. TURNER. 1999. Dynamic forest mosaics. P. 95-160 in Maintaining biodiversity in forested ecosystems, Hunter, M.L., Jr. (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. 698 p.
44. SULLIVAN, T.P., AND C.J. KREBS. 1981. An irruption of deer mice after logging of coastal coniferous forest. Can. J. For. Res. 11:586-592.
45. TALLMON, D., AND L.S. MILLS. 1994. Use of logs within home ranges of California red-backed voles on a remnant of forest. J. Mammal. 75:97-101.
46. THOMAS, J.W., M.G. RAPHAEL, R.G. ANTHONY, AND OTHERS. 1993. Viability assessments and management considerations for species associated with late-successional and old-growth forest of the Pacific Northwest. Research Report of the Scientific Analysis Team, USDA For. Serv., Washington, DC.
47. URE, D.C., AND C. MASER. 1982. Mycophagy of red-backed voles in Oregon and Washington. Can. J. Zool. 60:3307-3315.
48. USDA FOREST SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT. 1994. Record of decision for amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning documents within the range of the northern spotted owl. Standards and guidelines for management of habitat for late-successional and old-growth forest related species within the range of the northern spotted owl. Washington, DC.
49. VAN HORNE, B. 1981. Demography of Peromyscus maniculatus in seral stages of coastal coniferous forest in southeastern Alaska. Can. J. Zool. 59:1045-1061.
50. VOTH, E.H., C. MASER, AND M.L. JOHNSON. 1983. Food habits of Arborimus albipes, the white-footed vole, in Oregon (USA). Northwest Sci. 57:1-7.
51. WIMBERLY, M.C., T.A. SPIES, C.J. LONG, AND C. WHITLOCK. 2000. Simulating historical variability in the amount of old forests in the Oregon Coast Range. Conserv. Biol. 14:167-180.
52. WITMER, G.W., R.D. SAYLER, AND M.J. PIPAS. 1996. Biology and habitat use of the Mazama pocket gopher (Thomomys mazama) in the Puget Sound Area, Washington. Northwest Sci. 70:93-98.
53. WOOTTON, J.T. 1998. Effects of disturbance on species diversity: a multitrophic perspective. Am. Natur. 152:803-825.
54. WOLFF, J.O. 1989. Social behavior. P. 271-291 in Advances in the study of Peromyscus (Rodentia), Kirkland, G.L., Jr., and J.N. Layne (eds.). Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas. 366 p.