A comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets using various light sources, light guides, and cure times

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 121, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 510-515

  Evans, Larry James ^a,b   Peters, Charles ^a   Flickinger, Craig ^a   Taloumis, Louis ^a   Dunn, William ^a  

^a Lackland Air Force Base ^*  (United States)

^b Barksdale Air Force Base   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; POLYMER; RESIN CEMENT; TRANSBOND;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; FORCE; INCISOR; LIGHT; MACHINE; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; NONHUMAN; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PHOTODYNAMICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; POLYMERIZATION; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; RANDOMIZATION; SHEAR RATE; SHEAR STRENGTH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CATTLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; LIGHT; MALE; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; POLYMERS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TECHNOLOGY, DENTAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0036582519     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.121558     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod 1965;51:901-3.
2. Pollack BF, Blitzer MH. The advantages of visible light curing resins. NY St Dent J 1982;48:228-30.
3. Wilson HJ. Resin-based restoratives. Br J Orthod 1988;164:326-30.
4. Oesterle LJ, Messersmith ML, Devine SM, Ness CF. Light and setting times of visible-light-cured orthodontic adhesives. J Clin Orthod 1995;29:31-6.
5. Wang WN, Meng CL. A study of bond strength between light and self-cured orthodontic resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:350-4.
6. Greenlaw R, Way DC, Galil KA. An in vitro evaluation of a visible light-cured resin as an alternative to conventional resin bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:214-20.
7. Read MJF. The bonding of orthodontic attachments using a visible light cured adhesive. Br J Orthod 1984;11:16-20.
8. Helvatjoglou-Antoniadi M, Papadigianis Y, Koliniotou-Kubia, E, Kubias S. Surface hardness of light-cured composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:215-20.
9. Bradburn G, Pender N. An in vitro study of the bond strength of two light-cured composites used in the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:418-26.
10. Frost T, Norevall LI, Persson M. Bond strength and clinical efficiency for two light guide sizes in orthodontic bracket bonding. Br J Orthod 1997;24:35-40.
11. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Zamtua J. Effects of different types of light guides on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:447-51.
12. Legler LR, Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denys FR, Sadowsky PL. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:485-92.
13. Wang WN, Lu TC. Bond strength with various etching times on young permanent teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;100:72-9.
14. Surmount P, Dermaut L, Martens L, Moors M. Comparison in shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets between five bonding systems related to different etching times: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:414-9.
15. Yearn JA, Macclesfield UK. Factors affecting cure of visible light activated composites. Int Dent J 1985;35:218-25.
16. Forsten L. Curing depth of visible light-activated composites. Acta Odontol Scand 1984;2:23-8.
17. Oesterle LJ, Stellhart WC, Belanger GK. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:514-9.
18. Blankenau RJ, Kelsey WP, Powell GL, Shearer GO, Barkmeier WW, Cavel WT. Degree of composite resin polymerization with visible light and argon laser. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;4:40-42.
19. Cobb DS, Dederich DN, Gardner TV. In vitro temperature change at the dentin/pulpal interface by using conventional visible light versus argon laser. Lasers Surg Med 2000;26:386-97.
20. Powell GL, Morton TH, Whisenant BK. Argon laser oral safety parameters for teeth. Laser Surg Med 1993;13:548-52.
21. Powell GL, Anderson JR, Blankenau RJ. Laser and curing light induced in vitro pulpal temperature changes. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999;17:3-5.
22. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8.