Measurement of adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 351-354

  Tagger, Michael ^a   Tagger, Etty ^a   Tjan, Anthony H L ^b   Bakland, Leif K ^b,c  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b Department of Restorative Dentistry ^*  (United States)

^c LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ADHESION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; REPRODUCIBILITY; TENSILE STRENGTH; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADHESIVENESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESIN CEMENTS; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TENSILE STRENGTH; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 0036580134     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200205000-00001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co., 1996:25-30.
2. Ingle JI, West JD. Obturation of the radicular space. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, eds. Endodontics. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995:228-319.
3. Gutmann JL, Witherspoon DE. Obturation of the cleaned and shaped root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns R, eds. Pathways of the pulp. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998:258-360.
4. McComb D, Smith DC. Comparison of physical properties of polycarboxylate- based and conventional root canal sealers. J Endodon 1976;2:228- 35.
5. Ørstavik D, Eriksen HM, Beyer-Olsen EM. Adhesive properties and leakage of root canal sealers in vitro. Int Endod J 1983;16:59-63.
6. Stewart GG. A comparative study of three root canal sealing agents (Part 1). Oral Surg 1958;11:1029-41.
7. Grossman LI. Physical properties of root canal cements. J Endodon 1976;2:166-75.
8. Wennberg A, Ørstavik D. Adhesion of root canal sealers to bovine dentine and gutta-percha. Int Endod J 1990;23:13-9.
9. Gettleman BH, Messer HH, ElDeeeb ME. Adhesion of sealer cements to dentin with and without the smear layer. J Endodon 1991;17:15-20.
10. Tjan AHL, Nemetz H, Tjan AH. Bond strength of composite to metal mediated by metal adhesive promoter. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:550-4.
11. ANSI/ADA. Specification No. 57: endodontic sealing materials. 2nd revision. Chicago: American National Standards Institute and American Dental Association, 1999.
12. Tagger M, Tagger E, Kfir A. Release of calcium and hydroxyl ions from set endodontic sealers containing calcium hydroxide. J Endodon 1988;14: 588-91.
13. Schilke R, Bauss O, Lisson JR, Schukar M, Geurtsen W. Bovine dentin as a substitute for human dentin in shear bond strength measurements. Am J Dent 1999;12:92-6.
14. Galun EA, Saleh N, Lewinstein I. Diametral tensile strength and bonding to dentin of type I glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:424-8.
15. Weiger R, Heuchert T, Hahn R, Lost C. Adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to human radicular dentine. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995;11:214-9.
16. Carrigan PJ, Morse DR, Furst ML, Sinai IH. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of human dentinal tubules according to age and location. J Endodon 1984;10:359-63.
17. Higginbotham TL. A comparative study of the physical properties of five commonly used root canal sealers. Oral Surg 1967;24:89-101.
18. Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR. Leakage of four root canal sealers at different thickness. Int Endod J 1994;27:304-8.