Distributed utility planning using probabilistic production costing and generalized benders decomposition

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 497-505

  McCusker, Susan A ^b   Hobbs, Benjamin F ^a,c   Ji, Yuandong ^a,d  

^a IEEE

^b International Resources Group   (United States)

^c The Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^d Boca Photonics Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Demand side management; Distributed resources; Economics; Market model; Power generation planning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; INVESTMENTS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; GENERALIZED BENDERS DECOMPOSITION (GBD);

ELECTRIC INDUSTRY;

EID: 0036577270     PISSN: 08858950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.1007924     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. The distributed utility: A new electric utility planning and pricing paradigm
2. Linear programming based analysis of marginal cost pricing in electric utility capacity expansion
3. Long-range generation planning using generalized Benders' decomposition: Implementation and experience
4. Generalized benders decomposition
5. Solving an electricity generating capacity expansion planning problem by generalized Benders' decomposition
6. Integrating transmission into IRP Part I: Analytical approach
7. 2 compliance planning using probabilistic production costing and generalized Benders decomposition
8. An improved bounding based method for multiarea probabilistic production costing
9. Including a DC network approximtion in a multiarea probabilistic production costing model
10. An overview of the market for new merchant power plants
11. Distributed generation: An alternative to electric utility investments in system capacity
12. Multi-staged fuel cell power plant targeting 80% LHV efficiency
13. What's in the cards for distributed resources?
14. Contract networks for electric-power transmission
15. Advances in the spatial equilibrium modeling of mineral and energy issues
16. LCP models of Nash-Cournot competition in bilateral and POOLCO-based power markets