Discrete Sensor Validation with Multilevel Flow Models

IEEE Intelligent Systems

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 55-61

  Ohman, Bengt ^a  

^a GoalArt   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALARM SYSTEMS; ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; ENERGY TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

MULTILEVEL FLOW MODELS (MFM);

SENSORS;

EID: 0036564994     PISSN: 15411672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2002.1005632     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. M. Lind, Representing Goals and Functions of Complex Systems: An Introduction to Multilevel Flow Modeling, tech. report 90-D-38, Inst. Automatic Control Systems, Tech. Univ. of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 1990.
2. J.E. Larsson, Knowledge-Based Methods for Control Systems, doctoral thesis, Dept. of Automatic Control, Lund Inst. of Technology, Lund, Sweden, 1992.
3. J.E. Larsson, “Diagnostic Reasoning Strategies for Means-End Models,” Automatica, vol. 30, no. 5, May 1994, pp. 775-787.
4. J.E. Larsson, “Diagnosis Based on Explicit Means-End Models,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 80, no. 1, Jan 1996, pp. 29-93.
5. F. Dahlstrand, Methods for Alarm Reduction with Multilevel Flow Models of Industrial Processes, licentiate thesis, Dept. of Information Technology, Lund Inst. of Technology, Lund, Sweden, 2000.
6. F. Dahlstrand, “Consequence Analysis Theory for Alarm Analysis,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 15, nos. 1-2, 2002, pp. 27-36.
7. C. Perrow, Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1999.