Evaluation of pumice, fissure enameloplasty and air abrasion on sealant microleakage

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 199-203

  Blackwood, Julie A ^a,b   Dilley, Diane C ^d   Roberts, Michael W ^d   Swift Jr , Edward J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b New Hanover Medical Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Air abrasion; Enameloplasty; Microleakage; Sealants

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; FISSURE SEALANT; PUMICE; SILICATE;

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PERMEABILITY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; AIR ABRASION, DENTAL; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHILD; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ENAMEL PERMEABILITY; DENTAL LEAKAGE; HUMANS; MOLAR; PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SILICATES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0036562296     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Jensen OE, Handelman SL. Effect of an autopolymerizing sealant on viability of microflora in occlusal dental caries. Scand J Dent Res. 1980;88:382-388.
2. Jeronimus DJ, Till MJ, Sveen OB. Reduced viability of microorganisms under dental sealants. J Dent Child. 1975;42:275-280.
3. Sheykholeslam Z, Brandt S. Some factors affecting the bonding of orthodontic attachments to tooth surface. J Clin Orthod. 1977;11:734-773.
4. Newman GV, Facq JM. The effects of adhesive systems on tooth surfaces. Am J Orthod. 1971;59:67-75.
5. Ripa LW. The current status of pit and fissure sealants. A review. JCDA. 1985;5:367-380.
6. Burrow MF, Makinson OF, Orth D. Pits and fissures: remnant organic debris after acid-etching. J Dent Child. 1990;57:348-351.
7. Garcia-Godoy F, de Araujo FB. Enhancement of fissure sealant penetration and adaptation: The enameloplasty technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1994;19:13-18.
8. Goldstein RE, Parkins FM. Air-abrasive technology: its new role in restorative dentistry. JADA 1994;125:551-557.
9. Davis G, Waggoner W, Wilson S, Laurell K. Fissure sealants microleakage: comparison of acid etch versus air abrasion. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18:173 [abstract].
10. Guirguis R, Lee J, Conry J. Microleakage evaluation of restorations prepared with air abrasion. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21:311-315.
11. Haws SM, Oliveira ML, Vargas MA, Kanellis MJ. Air-abrasion and microleakage of pit and fissure sealants. J Dent Res. 1996;75:180 [abstract 1301].
12. Mentes A, Gencoglu N. An in vitro study of microleakage of sealants after mechanical or air abrasion techniques with or without acid-etching. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2000;4:151-156.
13. Zyskind D, Zyskind K, Hirschfeld Z, Fuks AB. Effect of etching on leakage of sealants placed after air abrasion. Pediatr Dent. 1998;20:25-27.
14. Chan DCN, Summitt JB, Garcia-Godoy F, Hilton TJ, Chung KH. Evaluation of different methods for cleaning and preparing occlusal fissures. Operative Dent. 1999;24:331-336.
15. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Wright GZ, Braverman I. Microleakage of sealants after conventional, bur, and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Pediatr Dent. 1998;20:173-176.
16. Xalabarde A, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR, Canalda C. Microleakage of fissure sealants after occlusal enameloplasty and thermocycling. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1998;22:231-235.
17. Övrebö RC, Raadal M. Microleakage in fissures sealed with resin or glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res. 1990;98:66-69.
18. Feigal RJ. Sealants and preventive restorations: review of effectiveness and clinical changes for improvement. Pediatr Dent. 1998;20:85-92.
19. Geiger SB, Gulayev S, Weiss EI. Improving fissure sealant quality: mechanical preparation and filling level. J of Dent. 2000;28:407-412.
20. Halterman CW, Rayman M, Rabbach V. Survey of pediatric dentists concerning dental sealants. Pediatr Dent. 1995;17:455-456.
21. Brown JR, Barkmeier WW. A comparison of six enamel treatment procedures for sealant bonding. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18:29-31.
22. Ellis RW, Latta MA, Westerman GH. Effect of air abrasion and acid etching on sealant retention: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21:316-319.
23. Shapira J, Eidelman E. Six-year clinical evaluation of fissure sealants placed after mechanical preparation: a matched pair study. Pediatr Dent. 1986;8:204-205.
24. Going RE, Loesche WJ, Grainger DA, Syed SA. The viability of JADA. 1978;97:455-462.
25. Kramer PF, Zelante F, Simionato MR. The immediate and long-term effects of invasive and noninvasive pit and fissure sealing techniques on the microflora in occlusal fissures of human teeth. Pediatr Dent. 1993;16:108-112.
26. Leverett DH, Handelman SL, Brenner CM, Iker HP. Use of sealants in the prevention and early treatment of carious lesions: cost analysis. JADA. 1983:106:39-42.
27. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Schuster GS, Fairhurst CW. Arresting caries by sealants: results of a clinical study. JADA. 1986;112:194-197.
28. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Adair SM, Sams DR, et al. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: nine-year results among children and adults. J Dent Child. 1995;62:97-107.
29. Swift EJ. The effect of sealants on dental caries: a review. JADA. 1988;116:700-704.
30. Eakle WS, Wong J, Huang H. Microleakage with microabrasion versus acid-etched enamel and dentin. J Dent Res. 1995;74:31 [abstract 160].
31. Jasmin JR, van Waes H, Vijayaraghavan TV. Scanning electron microscopy study of the fitting surface of fissure sealants. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13:370-372.
32. Birkenfeld LH, Schulman A. Enhanced retention of glass-ionomer sealant by enamel etching: A microleakage and scanning electron microscopic study. Quintessence Int. 1999;30:712-718.
33. Retief DH. Effect of conditioning the enamel surface with phosphoric acid. J Dent Res. 1973;52:333-341.
34. Silverstone LM. Fissure sealants: laboratory studies. Caries Res. 1974;8:2-26.
35. Feigal RJ, Musherure P, Gillespie B, Levy-Polack M, Quelhas I, Hebling J. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: a clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1850-1856.
36. Hebling J, Feigal RJ. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel. Am J Dent. 2000;13:187-191.