Macro design morphology of endoseous dental implants

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 543-551

  Sahiwal, Indira G ^a,b   Woody, Ronald D ^a   Benson, Byron W ^a   Guillen, Guillermo E ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; HUMAN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL;

EID: 0036561774     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.124432     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Benson BW. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment. Tex Dent J 1995;112:37-41.
2. Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:76-94.
3. Sewerin I. Identification of dental implants on radiographs. Quintessence Int 1992;23:611-8.
4. Shetty V, Benson BW. Orofacial implants. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000. p. 622-35.
5. Sewerin IP. Comparison of radiographic image characteristics of Brånemark and IMZ implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:151-6.
6. Sewerin I. Radiographic image characteristics of Brånemark titanium fixtures. Swed Dent J 1992;16:7-12.