Protandry models and their application to salmon

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 337-343

  Morbey, Yolanda E ^a,b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arrival timing; Onchorhynchus; Protandry; Salmon

Indexed keywords

ARRIVAL DATE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); PROTANDRY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SALMONID; SPAWNING GROUND;

ANIMALIA; ONCORHYNCHUS; PAPILIONOIDEA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0036558687     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/13.3.337     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Botterweg PF, 1982. Protandry in the pine looper, Bupalus piniarius (Lep., Geometridae); an explanatory model. Neth J Zool 32:169-193.
2. Brett JR, 1995. Energetics. In: Physiological Ecology, of Pacific Salmon (Groot C et al., eds). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press; 3-68.
3. Chebanov NA, 1997. Role of the "prior resident" effect in formation of the dominance-subordination relations and determination of the reproductive success values in Pacific salmons. J Ichthyol 37:110-115.
4. Chebanov NA, Varnavskaya NV, Varnavskiy VS, 1983. Effectiveness of spawning of male sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka (Salmonidae), of differing hierarchical rank by means of genetic-biochemical markers. J Ichthyol 23:51-55.
5. Cueva del Castillo R, Núñez-Fárfán J, 1999. Sexual selection on maturation time and body size in Sphenarium purpurascens (Orthoptera: Pyrgomorphidae): Correlated response to selection. Evolution 53:209-215.
6. English KK, Bocking RC, Irvine JR, 1992. A robust procedure for estimating salmon escapement based on the area-under-the-curve method. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1982-1989.
7. Fleming IA, Gross MR, 1994. Breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch): Measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 48:637-657.
8. Foote CJ, 1990. An experimental comparison of male and female spawning territoriality in a Pacific salmon. Behaviour 115:283-314.
9. Foote CJ, Brown GS, Wood CC, 1997. Spawning success of males using alternative mating tactics in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1785-1795.
10. Fretwell SD, Lucas HL Jr, 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19: 16-36.
11. Fukushima M, Smoker WW, 1997. Determinants of stream life, spawning efficiency, and spawning habitat in pink salmon in the Auke system, Alaska. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:96-104.
12. Groot C, Margolis L (eds), 1991. Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
13. Groot C, Margolis L, Clarke WC (eds), 1995. Physiological Ecology of Pacific Salmon. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
14. Hastings J, 1989. Protandry in western cicada killer wasps, (Sphecius grandis, Hymenoptera: Sphecidae): An empirical study of emergence time and mating opportunity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:255-260.
15. Hendry AP, 1998. Reproductive Energetics of Pacific Salmon: Strategies, Tactics, and Trade-Offs (PhD dissertation). Seattle: University of Washington.
16. Hendry AP, Berg OK, Quinn TP, 1999. Condition dependence and adaptation-by-time: Breeding date, life history, and energy allocation within a population of salmon. Oikos 85:499-514.
17. Hoopes DT, 1972. Selection of spawning sites by sockeye salmon in small streams. US Fish Bull 70:447-458.
18. Iwasa Y, Odendaal JF, Murphy DD, Ehrlich PR, Launer AE, 1983. Emergence patterns in male butterflies: A hypothesis and a test. Theor Popul Biol 23:363-379.
19. Ketterson ED, Nolan V Jr, 1976. Geographic variation and its climatic correlates in the sex ratio of eastern-wintering dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis hyemalis). Ecology 57:679-693.
20. Kokko H, 1999. Competition for early arrival in migratory birds. J Anim Ecol 68:940-950.
21. Maekawa K, Onozato H, 1986. Reproductive tactics and fertilization success of mature male Miyabe charr, Salvelinus malma miyabei. Environ Biol Fish 15:119-129.
22. Mattson CR, Rowland RG, 1963. Chum Salmon Studies at Traitors Cove Field Station June 1960 to March 1963. MS report 63-11. Auke Bay, Alaska: Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
23. Maynard Smith J, 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. McPhee MV, Quinn TP, 1998. Factors affecting the duration of nest defense and reproductive lifespan of female sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Environ Biol Fish 51:369-375.
25. Michener GR, 1984. Age, sex, and species differences in the annual cycles of ground-dwelling sciurids: Implications for sociality. In: The Biology of Ground-Dwelling Squirrels: Annual Cycles, Behavioral Ecology, and Sociality (Murie JO and Michener GR, eds). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 79-107.
26. Milinski M, Parker GA, 1991. Competition for resources. In: Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach, 3rd Ed (Krebs JR, Davies NB, eds). Oxford: Blackwell; 137-168.
27. Mjølnerød IB, Fleming IA, Refseth UH, Hindar K, 1998. Mate and sperm competition during multiple-male spawnings of Atlantic salmon. Can J Zool 76:70-75.
28. Morbey Y, 2000. Protandry in Pacific salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57: 1252-1257.
29. Myers JP, 1981. A test of three hypotheses for latitudinal segregation of the sexes in wintering birds. Can J Zool 59:1527-1534.
30. Neilson JD, Banford CE, 1983. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawner characteristics in relation to redd physical features. Can J Zool 61:1524-1531.
31. Neilson JD, Geen GH, 1981. Enumeration of spawning salmon from spawner residence time and aerial counts. Trans Am Fish Soc 110: 554-556.
32. Parker GA, Courtney SP, 1983. Seasonal incidence: adaptive variation in the timing of life history stages. J Theor Biol 105:147-155.
33. Parker GA, Sutherland WJ, 1986. Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: Phenotype-limited ideal free models. Anim Behav 34:1222-1242.
34. Parker RR, 1962. Estimations of ocean mortality rates for Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus). J Fish Res Board Can 19:561-589.
35. Perrin CJ, Irvine JR, 1990. A review of survey life estimates as they apply to the area-under-the-curve method for estimating the spawning escapement of Pacific salmon. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1733.
36. Quinn TP, Foote CJ, 1994. The effects of body size and sexual dimorphism on the reproductive behaviour of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Anim Behav 48:751-761.
37. Reimchen TE, 2000. Some ecological and evolutionary aspects of bear-salmon interactions in coastal British Columbia. Can J Zool 78: 448-457.
38. Ridgway MS, Shuter BJ, Post EE, 1991. The relative influence of body size and territorial behaviour on nesting asynchrony in male small-mouth bass, Micropterus dolomieui (Pisces: Centrarchidae). J Anim Ecol 60:665-681.
39. Ridley M, 1983. The Explanation of Organic Diversity: The Comparative Method and Adaptations for Mating. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Ruggerone GT, Hanson R, Rogers DE, 2000. Selective predation by brown bears (Ursus arctos) foraging on spawning sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Zool 78:974-981.
41. Schroder SL, 1982. The influence of intrasexual competition on the distribution of chum salmon in an experimental stream. In: Proceedings of the Salmon and Trout Migratory Behavior Symposium, June 1981 (Brannon EL, Salo EO, eds). Seattle: University of Washington; 275-285.
42. Sutherland WJ, Parker GA, 1985. Distribution of unequal competitors. In: Behavioural Ecology: Ecological Consequences of Adaptive Behaviour (Sibly RM, Smith RH, eds). Oxford: Blackwell; 255-274.
43. Sutherland WJ, Parker GA, 1992. The relationship between continuous input and interference models of ideal free distributions with unequal competitors. Anim Behav 44:345-355.
44. Thornhill R, Alcock J, 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
45. van den Berghe EP, Gross MR, 1986. Length of breeding life of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can J Zool 64:1482-1486.
46. Wiklund C, Fagerström T, 1977. Why do males emerge before females? A hypothesis to explain the incidence of protandry in butterflies. Oecologia 31:153-158.
47. Zonneveld C, 1996a. Being big or emerging early? Polyandry and the trade-off between size and emergence in male butterflies. Am Nat 147:946-965.
48. Zonneveld C, 1996b. Sperm competition cannot eliminate protandry. J Theor Biol 178:105-112.