The construction and assessment of a statistical model for the prediction of protein assay data

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 729-741

  Pittman, Jennifer ^c   Sacks, J ^a   Young, S Stanley ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGANDS;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ASSAYS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROTEINS; STATISTICAL METHODS; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN DATABASE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEINS;

EID: 0036557848     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0103828     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Gershon, D. Structural genomics - from cottage industry to industrial revolution. Nature 1999, 408, 273-275.
2. Hagmann, M. Computers aid vaccine design. Science 2000 290(6), 80-82.
3. Abbott, A. Functional genomics: Structures by numbers. Nature 1999, 408, 130-132.
4. West, M.; Nevins, J.; Marks, J.; Spang, R.; Zuzan, H. Bayesian Regression Analysis in the 'Large p, Small n' Paradigm with Application in DNA Microarray Studies; Technical Report 00-22; Duke University: Durham, NC, 2000.
5. Dudoit, S.; Fridlyand, J.; Speed, T. Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data; Technical Report #576; Department of Statistics, University of California at Berkeley: 2000.
6. Golub, G.; Van Loan, C. Matrix computations, 3rd ed.; John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, 1996.
7. Stewart, G. An updating algorithm for subspace tracking. IEEE Trans. Sig. Processing 1992, 40, 1535-1541.
8. Friedman, J. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann. Stat. 1991, 19(1), 1-141.
9. Wold, S. Cross validatory estimation of the number of components in principal components models. Technometrics 1978, 20, 397-406.
10. Myers, R. Classical and modern regression with applications; PWS-Kent Publishing: Boston, MA, 1990.
11. Baroni, M.; Costantino, G.; Cruciani, G.; Riganelli, D.; Valigi, R.; Clementi, S. Generating optimal linear PLS estimations (GOLPE): An advanced chemometric tool for handling 3D-QSAR problems. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1993, 12, 9-20.
12. Rusinko, A.; Farmen, M.; Lambert, C.; Brown, P.; Young, S. Analysis of a large structure/biological activity data set using recursive partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 9(6), 1017-1026.
13. Carhart, R.; Smith, D.; Venkataraghavan, R., Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: Devinition and applications. J. Chem. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73.
14. Bellman, R. Adaptive control processes: A guided tour; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1961.
15. Stewart, G. Introduction to matrix computations; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1973.
16. Vandeginste, B.; Massart, D.; Buydens, L.; De Jong, S.; Lewi, P.; Smeyers-Verbeke, J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part B; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998; Data Handling in Science and Technology - Volume 20B.
17. Healy, M. Matrices for statistics; Clarendon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1986.
18. Rencher, A. Methods of multivariate analysis; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, 1995.
19. Fierro, R.; Hansen, P.; Hansen, P. UTV Tools: Matlab Templates for Rank-Revealing UTV Decompositions; Technical Report IMM-REP-99-2; Technical University of Denmark: Lyngby, Denmark, 1999.
20. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R. Generalized additive models; Number 43, Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman and Hall/ CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 1990.
21. Pittman, J. Adaptive splines and genetic algorithms. J. Comput. Graph. Stat., accepted for publication.
22. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2001.
23. StatLib. http://lib.stat.cmu.edu (accessed November 1997).
24. Ye, J. On measuring and correcting the effects of data mining and model selection. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1998, 93(441), 120-131.
25. Simonoff, J. Smoothing methods in statistics; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1996.
26. van der Voet, H. Comparing the predictive accuracy of models using a simple randomization test. Chem. Intel. Lab. Sys. 1994, 25, 313-323.
27. Wehrens, R.; van der Linden, W. Bootstrapping principal regression models. J. Chem. 1997, 11, 157-172.
28. Ihaka, R.; Gentleman, R.R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics. J. Computat. Graphical Statistics 1996, 5(3), 299-314.
29. Kaufman, L.; Rousseeuw, P. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1990.
30. Ross, D.; Scheft, U.; Eisen, M.; Perou, C.; Rees, C.; Spellman, P.; Iyer, V.; Jeffrey, S.; Van de Rijn, M.; Waltham, M.; Pergamenschikov, A.; Lee, J.; Lashkari, D.; Shalon, D.; Myers, T.; Weinstein, J.; Botstein, D.; Brown, P. Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines. Nature Genetics 2000, 24, 227-235.
31. Easterling, R. Quantifying the uncertainty of computational predictions. Proceedings; 2001 SEM Annual Conference, Portland, OR, June 4-6, 2001.
32. Craven, P.; Wahba, G. Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Numerische Mathematik 1979, 31(4), 377-403.
33. Mars White Paper, Salford Systems, Inc., http://www.salford-system-s.com/whitepaper.html#mars (accessed April 2001).
34. Stewart, G. Updating a rank-revealing ULV decomposition. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 1993, 14, 494-499.
35. Hansen, P.; Yalamov, P. Computing symmetric rank-revealing decompositions via triangular factorization; Technical Report IMM-REP-2000-4; Technical University of Denmark: Lyngby, Denmark, 2000.
36. Fierro, R.; Hansen, P.; Hansen, P. UTV tools, version 1.0. California State University: San Marcos, CA, and Technical University of Denmark: Lyngby, Denmark. http://eivind.imm.dtu.dk/as/ or http:// www.netlib.org/numeralgo (accessed February 2001).