EyeTap devices for augmented, deliberately diminished, or otherwise altered visual perception of rigid planar patches of real-world scenes

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 158-175

  Mann, Steve ^a   Fung, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VISUAL PERCEPTION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; OPTICAL INSTRUMENT LENSES;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 0036555760     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/1054746021470603     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aczél, J. (1966). Lectures on functional equations and their applications (Vol. 29). New York and London: Academic Press.
2. Azuma, R.T. (2001). Augmented reality: Approaches and technical challenges. In W. Barfield & T. Caudell (Eds.), Fundamentals of wearable computers and augmented reality (pp. 27-63). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.
3. Behringcer, R. (1998). Improving the precision of registration for augmented reality in an outdoor scenario by visual horizon silhouette matching. Proceedings of first IEEE workshop on augmented reality (IWAR98), 225-230.
4. Candell, T., & Mizell, D. (1992). Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. Proc. Hawaii International Conf. on Systems Science, 2, 659-669.
5. Drascic, D., & Milgram, P. (1996). Perceptual issues in augmented reality. SPIE Volume 2653: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems III, 123-134.
6. Earnshaw, R.A., Gigante, M.A., & Jones, H. (1993). Virtual reality systems. London: Academic Press.
7. Ellis, S.R., Bucher, U.J., & Menges, B.M. (1995). The relationship of binocular convergence and errors in judged distance to virtual objects. Proceedings of the International Federation of Automatic Control, 297-301.
8. Feiner, S., MacIntyre, B., & Seligmann, D. (1993a). Karma (knowledge-based augmented reality for maintenance assistance). Available online at: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/graphics/projects/karma/karma.html.
9. _. (1993b). Knowledge-based augmented reality. Communications of the ACM, 36(7), 52-62.
10. Fuchs, H., Bajura, M., & Ohbuchi, R. Teaming ultrasound data with virtual reality in obstetrics. Available online at: http://www.ncsa.uinc.edu/Pubs/MetaCenter/SciHi93/lc.Highlights-BiologyC.html.
11. Klinker, G., Stricker, D., & Reiners, D. (2001). Augmented reality for exterior construction applications. In W. Barfield & T. Caudell (Eds.), Fundamentals of wearable computers and augmented reality (pp. 397-427). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.
12. Horn, B., & Schunk, B. (1981). Determining optical flow. Artificial Intelligence, 17, 185-203.
13. Irani, M., & Peleg, S. (1991). Improving resolution by image registration. CVGIP, 53, 231-239.
14. Mann, S. (1997a). Humanistic intelligence. Proceedings of Ars Electronica, 217-231. (Available online at: http://wearcam.org/ars/and http//www.aec.at/fleshfactor.
15. _. (1997b). Wearable computing: A first step toward personal imaging. IEEE Computer, 30(2), 25-32.
16. _. (1997c). An historical account of the 'WearComp' and 'WearCam' projects developed for 'Personal imaging.' International symposium on wearable computing, 66-73.
17. _. (1998). Humanistic intelligence/humanistic computing: 'Wearcomp' as a new framework for intelligent signal processing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11), 2123-2151.
18. _. (2000). Comparametric equations with practical applications in quantigraphic image processing. IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 9(8), 1389-1406.
19. _. (2001a). Intelligent image processing. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
20. _. (2001b). Wearable computing: Toward humanistic intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(3), 10-15.
21. Mann, S., & Fung, J. (2001). Videoorbits on eye tap devices for deliberately diminished reality or altering the visual perception of rigid planar patches of a real world scene. International Symposium on Mixed Reality (ISMR2001), 48-55.
22. Mann, S., & Picard, R.W. (1995). Video orbits of the projective group; a simple approach to featureless estimation of parameters (Tech. Rep. No. 338). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Also appears in IEEE Trans. Image Proc., (1997), 6(9), 1281-1295.).
23. Mann, S., & Picard, R.W. (1995). Video orbits of the projective group; a simple approach to featureless estimation of parameters (Tech. Rep. No. 338). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Also appears in IEEE Trans. Image Proc., (1997), 6(9), 1281-1295.).
24. Sutherland, I. (1968). A head-mounted three dimensional display. Proc. Fall Joint Computer Conference, 757-764.
25. Tekalp, A., Ozkan, M., & Sezan, M. (1992). High-resolution image reconstruction from lower-resolution image sequences and space-varying image restoration. Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Acoust., Speech and Sig. Proc., III-169.
26. Teodosio, L., & Bender, W. (1993). Salient video stills: Content and context preserved. Proc. ACM Multimedia Conf., 39-46.
27. Tsai, R.Y., & Huang, T.S. (1981). Estimating three-dimensional motion parameters of a rigid planar patch. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, and Sig. Proc., ASSP(29), 1147-1152.
28. Wyckoff, C.W. (1961). An experimental extended response film (Tech. Rep. No. NO. B-321). Boston, Massachusetts: Edgerton, Germeshausen & Grier, Inc.
29. Wyckoff, C.W. (1962, June-July). An experimental extended response film. S.P.I.E. Newsletter, 16-20.
30. You, S., Neumann, U., & Azuma, R. (1999). Hybrid inertial and vision tracking for augmented reality registration. Proceedings of IEEE VR, 260-267.
31. Zheng, Q., & Chellappa, R. (1993). A computational vision approach to image registration. IEEE Transactions Image Processing, 2(3), 311-325.