Statistical analysis in hip prosthesis evaluation

HIP International

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 86-93

  Bordini, B ^a   Toni, Aldo ^a   Stea, S ^a   Paderni, S ^a  

^a RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; CALCULATION; CHI SQUARE TEST; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEATH; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LIFE TABLE; PAGET BONE DISEASE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL RATE; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

EID: 0036555521     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112070000201200205     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Berry D, Kessler M, Morrey B. Maintaining a hip register for 25 years. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1997; 344: 61-8.
2. Harper WM, Abrams K, Elson R. Lessons of a hip failure. Register exists in Trent region. BMJ 1998; 316: 1985-6.
3. Fender D, Harper H, Gregg PJ. The Trent regional arthroplasty study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2000; 82: 944-7.
4. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 337-53.
5. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement. A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 110-121.
6. Lucht U. The Danish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 433-9.
7. Robertsson O. Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: An update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 503-13.
8. Lang I, Willert HG. Experiences with the German Endoprosthesis Register. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2001; 95: 203-8.
9. Puolakka TJS, Pajamaki KJJ, Halonen PJ, Pulkkinen PO, Paavolainen P, Nevalainen JK. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 433-41.
10. Niemcryk SJ, Kraus TJ, Mallory TH. Empirical considerations in orthopaedic research design and data analysis. Part II: The application of data analytic techniques. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5: 105-10.
11. Kassing DR, Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Nyhuis AW. Orthopedic research: An overview of data entry, database management, and statistical analysis. Orthopedics 1989; 12: 1531-42.
12. Stea S, Bordini B, Toni A, Traina F. Register of hip prosthesis at Istituto Rizzoli: Eleven years experience. Acta Orthop Scand 2002 (in press).
13. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457-81.
14. Dorey F, Amstutz HC. The validity of surviviorship analysis in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1989; 71: 544-8.
15. Cox DR. Regression models and lifetables. J Roy Statist Soc B 1972; 34: 187-220.
16. Toni A, Stea S, Bordini B, Traina F. Lost to follow-up in hip prosthesis register: Experience of R.I.P.O. Acta Orthop Scand 2002 (in press)
17. Nice Technology Appraisal Guidance n.2.