Long-term results of revised infrainguinal arterial reconstructions

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 773-778

  Darling III, R Clement ^a,b   Roddy, Sean P ^a,b   Chang, Benjamin B ^a,b   Paty, Philip S K ^a,b   Kreienberg, Paul B ^a,b   Maharaj, Dale ^a,b   Shah, Dhiraj M ^a,b  

^a Albany Medical College ^*

^b ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEURYSM; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTERY RECONSTRUCTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; BYPASS SURGERY; CLAUDICATION; DEMOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; GANGRENE; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; INGUINAL REGION; LIMB SALVAGE; MICROEMBOLISM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVASCULARIZATION; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ULCER; VEIN SURGERY; AGED; ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; CASE CONTROL STUDY; FEMALE; LEG; MALE; REOPERATION; TIME; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY; VASCULARIZATION; VEIN;

AGED; ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT, SURGICAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LEG; MALE; REOPERATION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY; VEINS;

EID: 0036549229     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.121131     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bandyk DF, Seabrook GR, Maldenhauer P, et al. Hemodynamics of vein graft stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1988;8:688-95.
2. Whittemore AD, Clowes AW, Couch NP, et al. Secondary femoral popliteal reconstruction. Ann Surg 1981;193:35-42.
3. Bandyk DF, Schmitt DD, Seabrook GR, et al. Monitoring functional patency of in situ saphenous vein bypass: the impact of a surveillance protocol and elective revision. J Vasc Surg 1989;9:286-96.
4. Leopold PW, Chang BB, Shandall AA, et al. Transantaneous flow measurements in situ bypass: an assessment of duplex scanning. Angiology 1986;3:143-8.
5. Mills JR, Bandyk DF, Grahtan V, Esses GE. The origin of infrainguinal vein graft stenosis: a prospective study based on duplex surveillance. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:16-25.
6. Bandyk DF, Bergamini TM, Towne JB, Schmitt DD, Seabrook GR. Durability of vein graft revision: the outcome of secondary procedures. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:200-10.
7. Chang BB, Leather RP, Kaufman JL, Kupinski AM, Leopold PW, Shah DM. Hemodynamic characteristics of ailing infrainguinal in situ vein bypass. J Vasc Surg 1990;12:596-600.
8. Veith FJ, Weiser RK, Gupta SK, et al. Diagnosis and management of failing lower extremity arterial reconstructions prior to graft occlusion. J Cardiovasc Surg 1984;25:381-4.
9. Green RM, McNamara J, Ouriel K, DeWeese JA. Comparison of infrainguinal graft surveillance techniques. J Vasc Surg 1990;11:207-15.
10. Belkin M, Conte MS, Donaldson MC, Mannick JA, Whittemore AD. Preferred strategies for secondary infrainguinal bypass: lessons learned from 300 consecutive reoperations. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:282-95.
11. Belkin M, Donaldson MC, Whittemore AD, et al. Observations on the use of thrombolytic occlusion of infrainguinal vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 1990;11:289-96.
12. Robinson KD, Sato DT, Gregory RT, Gayle RG, Demasi RJ, et al. Long-term outcome after early infrainguinal graft failure. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:425-38.
13. Dougherty MJ, Calligaro KD, DeLaurentis DA. The natural history of "failing" arterial bypass grafts in a duplex surveillance protocol. Ann Vasc Surg 1998;12:255-9.
14. Cohen JR, Mannick JA, Couch MP, Whittemore AD. Recognition and management of impending vein graft failure. Arch Surg 1986;121:758-9.
15. Bergamini TM, George SM, Massey HT, Henke PK, et al. Intensive surveillance of femoropopliteal-tibial autogenous vein bypasses improves long-term graft patency and limb salvage. Ann Surg 1995;221:507-16.
16. Berkowitz HD, Fox AD, Deaton DH. Reversed vein graft stenosis; early diagnosis and management. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:130-42.
17. Perler BA, Osterman FA, Mitchell SE, et al. Balloon dilatation versus surgical revision of infra-inguinal autogenous vein graft stenosis: long-term follow-up. J Cardiovasc Surg 1990;31:656-61.
18. Whittemore AD, Donaldson MC, Polak JF, et al. Limitations of balloon angioplasty for vein graft stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1991;14:340-5.
19. Bandyk DF, Bergamini TM, Towne JB, et al. Durability of vein graft revisions: the outcome of secondary procedures. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:200-10.
20. Leather RP, Shah DM, Corson JD, Karmody AM. Instrumental evolution of the valve incision method of in situ saphenous vein bypass. J Vasc Surg 1984;1:113-23.
21. Shah DM, Darling III RC, Chang BB, Fitzgerald KM, Paty PSK, Leather RP. Long-term results of in situ saphenous vein bypass: analysis of 2058 cases. Ann Surg 1995;22:438-48.
22. Gentile AT, Lee RW, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, et al. Results of bypass to the popliteal and tibial arteries with alternative sources of autogenous vein. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:272-80.
23. Caps MT, Cantwell Gab K, Bergelin RO, Strandness DE Jr. Vein graft lesions: time of onset and rate of progression. J Vasc Surg 1995;22:466-75.
24. Bergamini TM, Towne JB, Bandyk DF, Seabrook GR, Schmitt DD. Experience with in situ saphenous vein bypasses during 1981-1989: determinant factors of long term patency. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:137-49.
25. Erickson CA, Towne JB, Seabrook GR, Freischlag JA, Cambria RA. Ongoing vascular laboratory surveillance is essential to maximize long-term in situ saphenous vein bypass patency. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:18-27.
26. Mohan CR, Hoballah JJ, Schueppert MT, et al. Should all in situ saphenous vein bypasses undergo permanent duplex surveillance? Arch Surg 1995;130:483-8.
27. Reifsnyder T, Towne JB, Seabrook GR, Blair JF, Bandyk DF. Biologic characteristics of long-term autogenous vein grafts: a dynamic evolution. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:207-17.
28. Panetta TF, Marin ML, Veith FJ, Goldsmith J, Gordon RE, Jones AM, et al. Unsuspected preexisting saphenous vein disease: an unrecognized cause of vein bypass failure. J Vasc Surg 1992;15(1):102-12.