Shear bond strength of amalgam reinforced with a bonding agent and/or dentin pins

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 446-450

  Sen, Deniz ^a,b   Nayir, Emine ^a,b   Çetiner, Funda ^a,b  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Department of Prosthodontics ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PANAVIA EX; PHOSPHATE; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENAMEL; HIGH TEMPERATURE PROCEDURES; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LOW TEMPERATURE PROCEDURES; MACHINE; MOLAR TOOTH; POLYMERIZATION; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOOTH EXTRACTION; VELOCITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; PHOSPHATES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0036548235     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.122865     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hadavi F, Hey JH, Strasdin RB, McMeekin GP. Bonding amalgam to dentin by different methods. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:250-4.
2. Diefenderfer KE, Reinhardt JW. Shear bond strengths of 10 adhesive resin/amalgam combinations. Oper Dent 1997;22:50-6.
3. Staninec M, Holt M. Bonding of amalgam to tooth structure: tensile adhesion and microleakage tests. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:397-402.
4. Bagley A, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW. In vitro comparison of filled and unfilled universal bonding agents of amalgam to dentin. Oper Dent 1994;19:97-101.
5. Ramos JC, Perdigao J. Bond strengths and SEM morphology of dentin-amalgam adhesives. Am J Dent 1997;10:152-8.
6. Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1992;17:112-9.
7. Gordon M, Metzger Z. Resistance to horizontal forces of dowel and amalgam-core restorations: a comparative study. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14:337-44.
8. Burgess JO, Alvarez A, Summitt JB. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:128-32.
9. Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Batzer RC. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:753-9.
10. Fischer GM, Stewart GP, Panelli J. Amalgam retention using pins, boxes, and Amalgambond. Am J Dent 1993;6:173-5.
11. Podshadley AG. Retention of threaded pins in amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:47-51.
12. Staninec M. Retention of amalgam restorations: undercuts versus bonding. Quintessence Int 1989;20:347-51.
13. Cecconi BT, Asgar K. Pins in amalgam: a study in reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:159-69.
14. Duperon DF, Kasloff Z. Effects of three types of pins on compressive strength of dental amalgam. J Can Dent Assoc 1971;37:422-8.
15. Duperon DF, Kasloff Z. The effects of three types of pins on the tensile strength of dental amalgam. J Can Dent Assoc 1973;39:111-9.
16. Belcher MA, Stewart GP. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:309-14.
17. Boyer DB, Roth L. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams. Am J Dent 1994;7:91-4.
18. Millstein PL, Naguib GH. Effects of two resin adhesives on mechanical properties of set amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:106-9.
19. Winkler MM, Moore BK, Allen J, Rhodes B. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types. Oper Dent 1997;22:200-8.
20. Ruzickova T, Staninec M, Marshall GW, Hutton JE. Bond strengths of the adhesive resin-amalgam interface. Am J Dent 1997;10:192-4.
21. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Breschi R. Microscopic examination of resin bond to enamel and retainer with a phosphate monomer resin. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:298-301.
22. Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:240-9.