A problem-based nutrition care model that is diagnostic driven and allows for monitoring and managing outcomes

Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 578-589

  Lacey, Karen ^a   Cross, Nanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY   (United States)

^b AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIET THERAPY; DIETETICS; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EVOLUTION; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; METABOLIC DISORDER; MONITORING; NURSING; NUTRITION; NUTRITIONAL HEALTH; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYSICAL DISEASE BY BODY FUNCTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SUPPLEMENTATION; ARTICLE; DIABETIC DIET; EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NUTRITIONAL DISORDER; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIABETIC DIET; DIET THERAPY; DIETARY SERVICES; DIETETICS; HUMANS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NUTRITION DISORDERS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; SOCIETIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036546922     PISSN: 00028223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90133-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Malone M. The great convergence. In: Forbes ASAP Big Issue IV. 1999; p. 15.
2. Splett P, Myers E. A proposed model foreffective nutrition care. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:357-363.
3. Kight MA. Is nutritional diagnosis a critical step in the nutrition care process? J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:427-431.
4. American Dietetic Association. MNT Evidence-Based Guides for Practice. Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus. CD-ROM. 2001.
5. Bryk JA, Soto TK. Report on the 1999 Membership Database of the American Dietetic Association. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:947-953.
6. American Dietetic Association Strategic Plan. FY 2001-2004. Available at: http://www.eatright.com/stratplan.html. Accessed on February 25, 2002.
7. Ochs M. New Medicare changes to expand MNT access in 2002. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:30.
8. Medical Nutrition Therapy Across the Continuum of Care. 2nd ed. and Medical Nutrition Therapy Across the Continuum of Care. Supplement 1. The American Dietetic Association and Morrison Health Care. Chicago, Ill: The American Dietetic Association. 1998, 1997.
9. Myers E, Pritchett E. Evidence-based practice guides vs. protocols: What's the difference? J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:1085-1090.
10. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
11. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: http://www.ahcpr.gov. Accessed on February 18, 2002.
12. The National Institute for Nursing Research. Available at: http:// www.nih.gov/ninr. Accessed on February 18, 2002.
13. Disease Management Association of America. Definition of Disease Management. Available at: http://www.dmaa.org/definition.html. Accessed on February 11, 2002.
14. Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause's Food, Nutrition, & Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2000.
15. American Dietetic Association. Identifying patients at risk: ADA'S definitions for nutrition screening and nutrition assessment. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994; 94:838-839.
16. Splett PL. Developing and Validating Evidence-Based Guides for Dietetics Practice: A Tool Kit for Dietetics Professionals. Chicago, IL: The American Dietetic Association: 2000.
17. Kight MA. A dietetic-specific diagnostic reasoning approach to communicating in code. Diagn Nutr Network. 1993;2:25.
18. Lacey KA. Use of a standardized Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) care plan to teach nutrition problems and patient outcomes. 2000 Summit: Best Practices in Dietetics Education. A50-51. American Dietetic Association. FNCE 2000, Denver, Colorado, October 2000.
19. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Taxonomy of nursing diagnoses. St. Louis: NANDA; 1990.
20. Clark J, Lang N. Nursing's next advance: An international classification for nursing practice. International Nursing Review. 1992;39:109-112.
21. Taylor C, Lillis C, LeMone P. Fundamentals of Nursing: The Art and Science of Nursing Care. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1997.
22. Whitney EN, Cataldo CB, Rolfes SR. Understanding Normal and Clinical Nutrition. 5th ed. Boston: West/Wadsworth: 1998:519.
23. Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause's Food, Nutrition & Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2000.
24. Splett PL. Cost Outcomes of Nutrition Intervention. Part 2 of a 3-part Monograph. Measuring Effectiveness of Nutrition Interventions. Evansville, IN: Mead Johnson & Company; 1996.