King's conceptual system and theory of goal attainment: Past, present, and future

Nursing Science Quarterly

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 107-112

  Malinski, Violet M ^a   Frey, Maureen A ^b   Sieloff, Christina L ^c   Norris, Diane M ^c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual models; Imogene King; Knowledge development; Nurse theorists

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; NURSING; NURSING EDUCATION; REVIEW; SCIENCE; THEORY; ARTICLE; HISTORY; NURSING THEORY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;

EDUCATION, NURSING; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; NURSING THEORY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0036546806     PISSN: 08943184     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089431840201500204     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Alligood, M. R., & Marriner-Tomey, A. (Eds.). (2002). Nursing theory utilization and application (2nd ed.). New York: Mosby.
2. Alligood, M. R., & May, B. A. (2000). A nursing theory of personal system empathy: Interpreting a conceptualization of empathy in King's interacting systems. Nursing Science Quarterly, 13, 243-247.
3. Bramlett, M. H., Gueldner, S. H., & Sowell, R. L. (1990). Consumer-centric advocacy: Its connection to nursing frameworks. Nursing Science Quarterly, 3, 156-161.
4. Brooks, E. M., & Thomas, S. (1997). The perception and judgement of senior baccalaureate student nurses in clinical decision making. Advances in Nursing Science, 19, 50-69.
5. Daubenmire, M. J., & King, I. M. (1973). Nursing process: A systems approach. Nursing Outlook, 21, 512-517.
6. Doornbos, M. M. (1995). Using King's systems framework to explore family health in the families of the young chronically mentally ill. In M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King's systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 192-205). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Dulock, H. L., & Holzemer, W. L. (1991). Substruction: Improving the linkage from theory to method. Nursing Science Quarterly, 4, 83-87.
8. Du Mont, P. M. (1998). The effects of early menarche on health risk behaviors (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(07B), 3200.
9. Ehrenberger, H. E. (1998). Testing a theory of decision making derived from King's systems framework in women eligible for a cancer clinical trial (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(07B), 3201.
10. Fawcett, J. (1992). Conceptual models and nursing practice: The reciprocal relationship. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(20), 224-228.
11. Fawcett, J. (2000). Analysis and evaluation of contemporary nursing knowledge: Nursing models and theories. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
12. Fawcett, J. (2001). The nurse theorists: 21st-century updates - Imogene M. King. Nursing Science Quarterly, 14, 211-215.
13. Frey, M. A. (1989). Social support and health: A theoretical formulation derived from King's conceptual framework. Nursing Science Quarterly, 2, 138-148.
14. Frey, M. A. (1995). Toward a theory of families, children, and chronic illness. In M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King's systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 109-125). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Frey, M. A. (2001, January). Generating, testing, and rethinking a multisystems framework of health in children & adolescents with diabetes. Paper presented at King's Framework (& Related Theories) in the New Millenium, Tampa, FL.
16. Frey, M. A. (in press). King's conceptual system for nursing. In J. Fitzpatrick & A. Whall (Eds.), Conceptual models of nursing: Analysis and application (4th ed.). Norwalk, CT: Prentice Hall.
17. Frey, M. A., & Sieloff, C. L. (1995). Advancing King's systems framework and theory for nursing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Fries, J. E. (1998). Health and social support of older adults (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(12B), 6262.
19. Hampton, D. C. (1994). King's theory of goal attainment as a framework for managed care implementation in a hospital setting. Nursing Science Quarterly, 7, 170-173.
20. Johnson, M., & Mass, M. (1997). Nursing outcomes classifications (NOC). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
21. Kameoka, T. (1995). Analyzing nurse-patient interaction in Japan. In M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King's systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 239-250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Killeen, M. B. (1996). Patient-consumer perceptions and responses to professional nursing care: Instrument development. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(04B), 2479. (UMI No. PUZ9628910)
23. King, I. M. (1964). Nursing theory - Problems and prospect. Nursing Science, 2, 394-403.
24. King, I. M. (1968). A conceptual frame of reference. Nursing Research, 17, 27-31.
25. King, I. M. (1971). Toward a theory for nursing. New York: Wiley.
26. King, I. M. (1978). The "why" of theory development. In, Theory development: What, why, how (pp. 11-16). New York: National League for Nursing.
27. King, I. M. (1981). A theory for nursing: Systems, concepts, process. New York: Wiley.
28. King, I. M. (1988). Concepts: Essential elements in theories. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1, 22-25.
29. King, I. M. (1989). King's general systems framework and theory. In J. P. Riehl-Sisca (Ed.), Conceptual models for nursing practice (3rd ed., pp. 149-158). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
30. King, I. M. (1990). Health as the goal for nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 3, 123-128.
31. King, I. M. (1991). Nursing theory 25 years later. Nursing Science Quarterly, 4, 94-95.
32. King, I. M. (1992). King's theory of goal attainment. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 19-26.
33. King, I. M. (1995a). A systems framework for nursing. In M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King's systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 14-22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. King, I. M. (1995b). The theory of goal attainment. In M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King's systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 23-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. King, I. M. (1996). King's theory of goal attainment in research and practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 9, 161-166.
36. King, I. M. (1997a). King's theory of goal attainment in practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 180-185.
37. King, I. M. (1997b). Reflections of the past and a vision for the future. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 15-17.
38. King, I. M. (1998). Nursing informatics: A universal nursing language. Florida Nurse, 46, 1-3, 5.
39. King, I. M. (1999). A theory of goal attainment: Philosophical and ethical implications. Nursing Science Quarterly, 12, 292-296.
40. King, I. M. (2001). Theory of goal attainment. In M. Parker (Ed.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (pp. 275-286). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
41. May, B. A. (2000). Relationships among basic empathy, self-awareness, and learning styles of baccalaureate pre-nursing students within King's personal system (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(06B), 2991.
42. McCloskey, J. C., & Bulechek, G. M. (2000). Nursing interventions classification (NIC) (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
43. McQuiston, C. M., & Campell, J. C. (1997). Theoretical substruction: A guide for theory testing research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 117-123.
44. Meighan, M. M. (1998). Testing a nursing intervention to enhance paternal-infant interaction and promote paternal role assumption (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(07B), 3204.
45. Norris, D. M., & Frey, M. A. (2002). King's systems framework and theory in nursing practice. In M. R. Alligood & A. Marriner-Tomey (Eds.), Nursing theory: Utilization and application (2nd ed., pp. 173-196). New York: Mosby.
46. Parker, M. (Ed.). (2001). Nursing theories and nursing practice. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
47. Sieloff, C. L. (1995). Development of a theory of departmental power. In M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King's systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 46-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Sieloff, C. L. (1999). Sieloff-King assessment of group power within organizations. Unpublished manuscript, Oakland University, Rochester, MI.
49. Sieloff, C. L., Frey, M., & Killeen, M. (2001). Application of King's work to nursing practice. In M. Parker (Ed.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (pp. 287-313). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
50. Tritsch, J. M. (1996). Application of King's theory of goal attainment and the Carondelet St. Mary's case management model. Nursing Science Quarterly, 11, 69-73.
51. Wicks, M. N. (1995). Family health as derived from King's framework. In M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King's systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 97-108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Wicks, M. N. (1997). A test of the Wicks family health model in families coping with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Family Nursing, 3, 189-212.