Attentional cueing effect in the identification of words and pseudowords of different length

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 445-463

  Auclair, Laurent ^a,c   Siéroff, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SAVOIE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; READING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; READING;

EID: 0036545744     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000415     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allport, D.A. (1977). On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report: The effect of visual masking. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Behrmann, M. (1994). Neglect dyslexia: Attention and word recognition. In M.J. Farah & G. Ratcliff (Eds.), The neuropsychology of high-level vision. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Behrmann, M., Moscovitch, M., Black, S.E., & Mozer, M. (1990). Perceptual and conceptual mechanisms in neglect: Two contrasting case studies. Brain, 113, 1163-1183.
4. Behrmann, M., Moscovitch, M., & Mozer, M. (1991). Directing attention to words and non-words in normal subjects in a computational model: Implication for neglect dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8(3/4), 213-248.
5. Besner, D., Stolz, J.A., & Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 221-225.
6. Brunn, J.L., & Farah, M.J. (1991). The relation between spatial attention and reading: Evidence from the neglect syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 59-75.
7. Bub, D., & Gum, T. (1988). PsychLab Software [Computer software]. Montreal, Canada: McGill University, Neurolinguistic Department.
8. Carr, T.H., & Posner, M.I. (1995). The impact of learning to read on the functional anatomy of language. In D.E. Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
9. Chasteen, A.L., & Pratt, J. (1999). The effect of inhibition of return on lexical access. Psychological Science, 10, 41-46.
10. Chiarello, C., Maxfield, L., Richards, L., & Kahan, T. (1995). Activation of lexical codes for simultaneously presented words: Modulation by attention and pathway strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 776-808.
11. Cohen, J.D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J.L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing model of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
12. Content, A., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1990). Brulex. Une base de données lexicales informatisées pour le français écrit et parlé. L'Année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.
13. Content, A., & Radeau, M. (1998). Donnée statistiques sur la structure orthographique du français. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, no hors série, 2-87.
14. Downing, C.J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M.I. Posner & O.M. Marin (Eds.), Mechanisms of attention: Attention and performance XI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Eriksen, C.W., & Hoffman, J.E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selecting encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201-204.
16. Flowers, J.H., & Lohr, D.J. (1985). How does familiarity affect visual search for letter strings? Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 557-567,
17. Gatheron, D., & Siéroff, E. (1999). Right hemifield superiority in reading and attentional factors. Brain and Cognition, 40(1), 122-125.
18. Gatti, S.V.,& Egeth, H.E. (1978). Failure of spatial selectivity in vision. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 181-184.
19. Givon, T., Yang, L.,& Gernsbasher, M. (1990). The processing of second language vocabulary from attended to automated word recognition (Tech. Rep. No. 90-4). University of Oregon, Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences.
20. Hardyck, C., Chiarello, C., Dronkers, N.F., & Simpson, G.V. (1985). Orienting attention within visual fields: How efficient is interhemispheric transfer? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 650-666.
21. Henderson, J.M. (1991). Stimulus discrimination follow ing covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 91-106.
22. Herdman, C.M. (1992). Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 460-470.
23. Johnston, J.C., & McClelland, J.L. (1974). Perception of letters in words: Seek not and ye shall find. Science, 184, 1192-1194.
24. Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D. (1983). Test of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effect by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497-509.
25. LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 371-379.
26. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
27. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 203-323.
28. Lambert, A.J. (1985). Selectivity and stages of processing - an enduring controversy in attention theory: A review. Current Psychological Research & Reviews, 239-256.
29. Marshall, J.C., Caplan, D., & Holmes, J.M. (1975). The measure of laterality. Neuropsychologia, 13, 315-231.
30. McCann, R.S., Folk, C.L., & Johnston, J.C. (1992). The role of spatial attention in visual word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1015-1029.
31. McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
32. Mozer, M.C. (1991). The perception of multiple objects: A connectionist approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/ Bradford.
33. Mozer, M.C., & Behrmann, M. (1990). On the interaction of selective attention and lexical knowledge. A connectionist account of neglect dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 96-120.
34. Müller, H.J., & Rabbitt, P.M.A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual spatial attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
35. Neely, J.H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current finding and theories. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Ortells, J., Tudela, P., Noguera, C., & Abad, M. (1998). Attentional orienting within visual field in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1675-1689.
37. Posner, M.I. (1978). Chronometric exploration of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38. Posner, M.I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
39. Posner, M.I. (1988). Structures and functions of selective attention. In T. Boll & B.K. Bryant (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement, and practice. Washington, DC: APA.
40. Posner, M.I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of attention. In H. Bouma & D. Bowhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
41. Posner, M.I., Snyder, C., & Davidson, B. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
42. Prinzmetal, W., & Millis-Wright, M. (1984). Cognitive and linguistic factors affect visual feature integration. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 305-340.
43. Prinzmetal, W., Presit, D.E., & Posner, M.I. (1986). Does attention affect visual feature integration? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 361-369.
44. Remington, R.W., & Pierce, L. (1984) Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 393-399.
45. Siéroff, E., & Auclair, L. (1999). Size cueing of the letter string in reading. Manuscript submitted for publication.
46. Siéroff, E., Pollatsek, A., & Posner, M.I. (1988). Recognition of visual letter strings following damage to the posterior visual spatial attention system. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 427-449.
47. Siéroff, E., & Posner, M.I. (1988). Cueing spatial attention during processing of words and letter strings in normals. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 451-472.
48. Soraci, S.A., Franks, J.J., Carlin, M.T., Hoen, T.P., & Hardy, J.K. (1992). A "pop out" effect with words and non-words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 290-292.
49. Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
50. Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
51. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
52. Treisman, A., Kahneman, D., & Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 527-532.
53. Wright, R., & Ward, L. (1994). Shifts of visual attention: An historical and methodological overview. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 151-166.