|
Volumn 155, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 622-628
|
Is residual confounding a reasonable explanation for the apparent protective effects of beta-carotene found in epidemiologic studies of lung cancer in smokers?
|
Author keywords
Beta carotene; Lung neoplasms; Measurement error; Smoking
|
Indexed keywords
BETA CAROTENE;
CANCER;
ARTICLE;
BLOOD LEVEL;
CANCER RISK;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIET SUPPLEMENTATION;
EXPOSURE;
HUMAN;
LUNG CANCER;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SMOKING;
STATISTICAL MODEL;
ANTIOXIDANTS;
BETA CAROTENE;
CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES;
HUMANS;
LUNG NEOPLASMS;
MODELS, STATISTICAL;
SMOKING;
|
EID: 0036532254
PISSN: 00029262
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/aje/155.7.622 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (60)
|
References (31)
|