Trends in somatic cell counts, bacterial counts, and antibiotic residue violations in New York state during 1999-2000

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 782-789

  Van Schaik, G ^a   Lotem, M ^a   Schukken, Y H ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibiotic residue; Bacterial count; New York State; Somatic cell count

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; DRUG RESIDUE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; CELL COUNT; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DAIRYING; FEMALE; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; MILK; UNITED STATES;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CATTLE; CELL COUNT; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; DAIRYING; DRUG RESIDUES; FEMALE; MASTITIS, BOVINE; MILK; NEW YORK;

EID: 0036528451     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74136-2     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control AC-19:716-723.
2. Collett, D. 1991. Modelling Binary Data. Chapman & Hall, London.
3. Diggle, P. J., K.-H. Liang, and S. L. Zeger. 1994. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford Univ. Press Inc., New York.
4. Giddons-Burgener, S. N., J. B. Kaneene, J. W. Lloyd, and R. J. Erskine. 1999. Evaluation of certification in the milk and dairy beef quality assurance program and associated factors on the risk of having violative antibiotic residues in milk from dairy farms in Michigan. Am. J. Vet. Res. 60:1312-1316.
5. Khaitsa, M. L., T. E. Wittum, K L. Smith, J. L. Henderson, and K. H. Hoblet. 2000. Herd characteristics and management practices associated with bulk-tank somatic cell counts in herds in official dairy herd improvement association programs in Ohio. Am. J. Vet. Res. 61:1092-1098.
6. Laevens, H., H. Deluyker, Y. H. Schukken, L. De Meulemeester, R. Vandermeersch, E. De Muelenaere, and A. De Kruif. 1997. Influence of parity and stage of lactation on the somatic cell count in bacteriologically negative dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80:3219-3226.
7. Liang, K.-H., and S. L. Zeger. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13-22.
8. Lin, L. I. 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255-268.
9. Ma, Y., C. Ryan, D. M. Barbano, D. M. Galton, M. A. Rudan, and K. J. Boor. 2000. Effects of somatic cell count on quality and shelf-life of pasteurized fluid milk. J. Dairy Sci. 83:264-274.
10. McEwen, S. A., W. D. Black, and A. H. Meek. 1991. Antibiotic residue prevention methods, farm management, and occurrence of antibiotic residues in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 74:2128-2137.
11. Norman, H. D., R. H. Miller, J. R. Wright, and C. R. Wiggans. 2000. Herd and state means for somatic cell count from dairy herd improvement. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2782-2788.
12. Ruegg, P. L., and T. J. Tabone. 2000. The relationship between antibiotic residue violations and somatic cell counts in Wisconsin dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2805-2809.
13. Sargeant, J. M., Y. H. Schukken, and K. E. Leslie. 1998. Ontario bulk milk somatic cell count reduction program: progress and outlook. J. Dairy Sci. 81:1545-1554.
14. Saville, W. J., T. E. Wittum, and K. L. Smith. 2000. Association between measures of milk quality and risk of violative antimicrobial residues in grade-A raw milk. JAVMA 217:541-545.
15. SAS OnlineDoc, Version 8. 1999. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.