Use of imaging guides in preimplant tomography

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 483-487

  Almog, Dov M ^a,b   Torrado, Eduardo ^a   Moss, Mark E ^a   Meitner, Scan W ^a   LaMar, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GUTTA PERCHA; LEAD; STAINLESS STEEL;

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; ORAL SURGERY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERIODONTICS; RADIOGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; GUTTA-PERCHA; HUMANS; JAW; LEAD; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERIODONTICS; PROSTHODONTICS; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURGERY, ORAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY;

EID: 0036526918     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.121389     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Pietrokovski J. The bony residual ridge in man. J Prosthet Dent 1975;34:456-62.
2. Clark DE, Danforth RA, Barnes RW, Burtch ML. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques. J Oral Implantol 1990;16:156-64.
3. Grondahl K, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl HG, Johnsson T. Reliability of hypocycloidal tomography for the evaluation of the distance from the alveolar crest to the mandibular canal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20:200-4.
4. Petersson A, Lindh C, Carlsson LE. Estimation of the possibility to treat the edentulous maxilla with osseointegrated implants. Swed Dent J 1992;16:1-6.
5. Fredholm U, Bolin A, Andersson L. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique. Swed Dent J 1993;17:103-9.
6. Weinberg LA. CT scan as a radiologie data base for optimum implant orientation. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:381-5.
7. Lam EW, Ruprecht A, Yang J. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:42-6.
8. Tyndall AA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:630-7.
9. Petrikowski CG, Pharoah MJ, Schmitt A. Presurgical radiographic assessment for implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:59-64.
10. Kassebaum DK, Nummikoski PV, Triplett RG, Langlais RP. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70:674-8.
11. Modica F, Fava C, Benech A, Preti G. Radiologic-prosthetic planning of the surgical phase of the treatment of edentulism by osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:541-6.
12. Israelson H, Plemons JM, Watkins P, Sory C. Barium-coated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:52-61.
13. Mecall RA, Rosenfeld AL. The influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on implant fixture placement and tooth position. 2. Presurgical determination of prosthesis type and design. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:33-51.
14. Almog DM, Onufrak JM, Hebel K, Meitner SW. Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography - a pilot study. J Oral Implantol 1995;21:275-80.
15. Almog DM, Sanchez R. Correlation between planned prosthetic and residual bone trajectories in dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:562-7.