Three-dimensional quantitative structure - Property relationship (3D-QSPR) models for prediction of thermodynamic properties of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): Enthalpy of vaporization

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 299-304

  Puri, Swati ^a   Chickos, James S ^a   Welsh, William J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS (QSPR);

DERIVATIVES; ELECTROSTATICS; ENTHALPY; ISOMERS; THERMODYNAMICS; VAPORIZATION;

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS;

EID: 0036522799     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci010093j     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Wania, F.; Mackay, D. Global Fractionation and Cold Condensation of Low Volatility Organochlorine Compounds in Polar Regions. AMBIO 1993, 22, 10-18.
2. Yamasaki, H.; Kuwata, K.; Miyamoto, H. Effects of Ambient Temperature on Aspects of Airborne Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1982, 16, 189-194.
3. Allen, J.O.; Sarofim, A.S.; Smith, K.A. Thermodynamic Properties of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Subcooled Liquid State. Polym. Atom. Compds. 1999, 13, 261-283.
4. Bidleman, T.F. Estimation of Vapor Pressures for Nonpolar Organic Compounds by Capillary Gas Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1984, 56, 2490-2496.
5. Falconer, R.L.; Bidleman, T.F. Vapor Pressures and Predicted Particle/Gas Distributions of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Congeners as Functions of Temperature and Ortho-Chlorine Substitution. Atm. Environ. 1994, 28, 547-554.
6. Ruzicka, K.; Majer, V. Simultaneous Treatment of Vapor Pressures and Related Thermal Data Between the Triple and Normal Boiling Temperatures for n-Alkanes C5-C20. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1994, 23, 1-39.
7. Puri, S.; Chickos, J.S.; Welsh, W.J. Determination of Vaporization Enthalpies of Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Correlation Gas Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1480-1484.
8. Ong, Y.S.; Hites, R.A. Relationship between Gas Chromatographic Retention Indexes and Computer-Calculated Physical Properties of Four Compound Classes. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 2829-2834.
9. Makino, M.; Kamiya, M.; Matsushita, H. Computer-Assisted Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Times of Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Use of Quantum Chemical Molecular Properties. Chemosphere 1992, 25, 1839-1849.
10. Hasan, M.N.; Jurs, P.C. Computer-Assisted Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Times of Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 978-982.
11. Makino, M. Novel Classification to Predict Relative Gas Chromatographic Retention Times and n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients of Polychlorinated Biphenyts. Chemosphere 1999, 39, 893-903.
12. Cramer, R.D., III; Patterson, D.E.; Bunce, J.D. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
13. The Tripos Bookshelf Version 4.0; Tripos: St. Louis, MO, 1999; p 9.
14. (a) Cox, S.R.; Williams, D.E. Representation of the Molecular Electrostatic Potential by a New Atomic Charge Model. J. Comput. Chem. 1981, 2, 304-323.
15. (b) Chirlian, L.E.; Francl, M.M. Atomic Charges Derived from Electrostatic Potentials: A Detailed Study. J. Comput. Chem. 1987, 8, 894-905.
16. (c) Breneman, C.M.; Wiberg, K.B. Determining Atom-Centered Monopoles from Molecular Electrostatic Potentials. The Need for High Sampling Density in Formamide Conformational Analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 361-373.
17. (d) Singh, U.C.; Kollman, P.A. An Approach to Computing Electrostatic Charges for Molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 1984, 5, 129-145.
18. (e) Besler, B.H.; Merz, K.M.; Kollman, P.A. Atomic Charges Derived from Semiempirical Methods. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 431-439.
19. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Iterative Partial Equalization of Orbital Electronegativity-A Rapid Access to Atomic Charges. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3219-3288.
20. Halgren, T.A. Merck Molecular Force Field. I. Basis, Form, Scope, Parametrization, and Performance of MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 490-519.
21. (a) Dewar, M.J.S.; Thiel, W. Ground States of Molecules. 38. The MNDO Methodol. Approximations and Parameters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4899-4907.
22. (b) Dewar, M.J.S.; Thiel, W. Ground States of Molecules. 39. MNDO Results for Molecules Containing Hydrogen, Carbon, Nitrogen and Oxygen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4907-4917.
23. (a) Stewart, J.J.P. Optimisation of Parameters for Semiempirical Methods I. Methodol. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 209-220.
24. (b) Stewart, J.J.P. Optimisation of Parameters for Semiempirical Methods II. Applications. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 221-264.
25. Dewar, M.J.S.; Zoebisch, E.G.; Healy, E.F.; Stewart, J.J.P. AM1: A New General Purpose Quantum Mechanical Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902-3909.
26. Mulholland, J.A.; Sarofim, A.F.; Rutledge, G.C. Semiempirical Molecular Orbital Estimation of the Relative Stability of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Isomers produced by o-Dichlorobenzene Pyrolysis. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 6890-6896.
27. (a) Wold, H. Soft Modeling. The Basic Design and Some Extensions. In Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction; Joreskog, K.G., Wold, H., Eds.; Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam, 1982; Vol. II, Chapter 1, p 1.
28. (b) Wold, S.; Albano, C.; Dunn, W.J., III; Edlund, U.; Esbensen, K.; Geladi, P.; Hellberg, S.; Johansson, E.; Lindberg, W.; Sjosstrom, M. Multivariate Data Analysis in Chemistry. In Chemometrics: Mathematics and Statistics in Chemistry; Kowalski, B., Ed.; Reidel: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1984; pp 17-95.