Differences between local and review urinary cytology in diagnosis of bladder cancer. An interobserver multicenter analysis

European Urology

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 284-289

  Raitanen, Mika P ^a   Aine, Risto ^b   Rintala, Erkki ^c   Kallio, Jukka ^b   Rajala, Pertti ^d   Juusela, Harri ^e   Tammela, Teuvo L J ^f  

^a SEINÄJOKI CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^d TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^e JORVI HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^f TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bladder neoplasm; Marker; Urine cytology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CYSTOSCOPY; CYTOPATHOLOGY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICTURITION; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; URINE CYTOLOGY;

CARCINOMA, TRANSITIONAL CELL; CYSTOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0036522515     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00006-4     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Papanicolaou GN, Marshall VF. Urine sediment smears: A diagnostic procedure in cancers of the urinary tract. Science 1945;101:519.
2. Murphy W. Current status of urinary cytology in evaluation of bladder neoplasms. Human Pathol 1990;21:886.
3. Raitanen M-P, Marttila T, Kaasinen E, Rintala E, Aine R, Tammela TLJ. Sensitivity on human complement factor H related protein (BTA stat) test and voided urine cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. J Urol 2000;163(6):1689.
4. Raab SS, Slagel DD, Jensen CS, Teague MW, Savell VH, Ozkutlu D, et al. Transitional cell carcinoma: Cytologic criteria to improve diagnostic accuracy. Mod Pathol 1996;9(3):225-32.
5. Ramakumar S, Bhuiyan J, Besse JA, Roberts SG, Wollan BC, Blute ML, et al. Comparison of screening methods in the detection of bladder cancer. J Urol 1999;161:388.
6. Taylor JNE, Macfarlane EWE, Doolittle KH. Cytological studies of urine by Millipore filtration technique (preliminary report). J Urol 1962;88:704.
7. Tyrkkö J. Exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of urothelial neoplasms. Doctoral Thesies. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1972;(Suppl):19.
8. Bastacky S, Ibrahim S, Wilczynski SP, Murphy WM. The accuracy of urinary cytology in daily practice. Cancer 1999;87(3):118.
9. Mostofi FK, Sobin LH, Torloni H. Histological Typing of Urinary Bladder Tumours. Presented at World Health Organization, Geneva, 1973.
10. Harmer MH. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 3rd Ed. Geneva: International Union Against Cancer, 1978.
11. Altman D, Douglas G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991. p. 404.
12. Holmang S. Follow-up of patients with non-invasive and superficially invasive bladder cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 2000;18(4):273.
13. Baltaci S, Suzer O, Ozer G, Beduk Y, Gogus O. The efficacy of urinary cytology in the detection of recurrent bladder tumours. Int Urol Nephrol 1996;28(5):649.
14. Koss LG, Deitch D, Ramanathan R, Sherman AB. Diagnostic value of cytology of voided urine. Acta Cytol 1985;29(5):810-6.