Efficacy of diagnosis of mechanical cholestasis by magnetic resonance cholangiography

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 353-358

  Urban, Michael ^a   Holzer, Brigitte ^a   Sebesta, Christian ^a   Schmid, Leopold ^a   Schiessel, Rudolf ^a   Hruby, Walter ^a   Rosen, Harald R ^a  

^a DANUBE HOSPITAL   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT STONE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLESTASIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENOSIS, OCCLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLESTASIS; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036518141     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0232-z     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lindsell DR. Ultrasound imaging of pancreas and biliary tract. Lancet 1990;335:390
2. Malchow-Moller A, Matzen P, Bjerregaard B, et al. Causes and characteristics of 500 consecutve cases of jaundice. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1981;16:1-6
3. Pant CS, Gupta RK, Jena A, et al. Ultrasonic demonstration of anicteric biliary obstruction. Australas. Radiol. 1986;30:322-326
4. Teplick SK, Flick P, Brandon JC. Transhepatic cholangiography in patients with suspected biliary disease and non-dilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Gastrointest. Radiol. 1991;16:193-197
5. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976;70:314-320
6. Lenriot JP, Le Neel JC, Hay JM, et al. Retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary lithiasis: prospective evaluation in surgical circle. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 1993;17:244-250
7. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, et al. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a heavily T2-weighted contrast enhanced fast-sequence. Radiology 1991;181:805-808
8. Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T, et al. Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 1992;183:578-580
9. Ishizaki Y, Wakayama T, Okada Y, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1993;88:2072-2077
10. Hall-Craggs MA, Allen CM, Owens CM, et al. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology 1993;189:423-427
11. Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Sekijima JH, et al. Evaluation of a nonbreath-hold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology 1995;196:227-232
12. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1994;163:847-850
13. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen OL, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999;44:118-122
14. Pasanen P, Partanen K, Pikkarainen P, et al. Ultrasonography, CT and ERCP in the diagnosis of choledochal stones. Acta Radiol. 1992;33:53-56
15. Baron RL. Common bile duct stones: reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology 1987;162:419-424
16. O'Connor HJ, Hamilton I, Ellis WR, et al. Ultrasound detection of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with ERCP in the postcholecystectomy patient. Gastrointest. Radiol. 1986;11:161-164
17. Cronan JJ. US diagnosis of choledocholithiasis; a reappraisal. Radiology 1986;161:133-135
18. Stott MA, Farrands PA, Guyer PB, et al. Ultrasound of the common bile duct in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. J. Clin. Ultrasound 1991;19:73-76
19. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1994;163:847-850
20. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996;110:589-597
21. Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, et al. Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1990;154:623-628
22. Outwater EK, Gordon SJ. Imaging the pancreatic and biliary ducts with MR. Radiology 1994;192:19-21
23. McEntee G, Grace PA, Bouchier-Hayes D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the common bile duct. Br. J. Surg. 1991;78:385-386
24. Gompertz BHK, Rhodes M, Lennard WJ. Laparoscopic cholangiography: an effective and inexpensive technique. Br. J. Surg. 1992;79:233-239