The unrecognized paradigm shift in nursing: Implications, problems, and possibilities

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 72-76

  Whall, Ann L ^a   Hicks, Frank D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NURSING; NURSING EDUCATION; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; PHILOSOPHY; RESEARCH;

EDUCATION, NURSING; PHILOSOPHY, NURSING; RESEARCH;

EID: 0036517093     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mno.2002.121730     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Forbes D, King K, Kushner K, Letourneau N, Myrick A, Profetto-McGrath J. Warrantable evidence in nursing science. J Adv Nurs 1999;29:373-9.
2. Reed PG. A treatise on nursing knowledge development for the 21st century: beyond postmodernism. Adv Nurs Sci 1995;17:70-84.
3. Silva MC. Scholarly dialogue. The state of nursing science: reconceptualizing for the 21st century. Nurs Sci Q 1999;12:221-6.
4. Jacox A, Webster G. Competing theories of science. In Nicoll L, editor. Perspectives on nursing theory. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott; 1997. p. 423-31.
5. Letourneau N, Allen, M. Post-positivist critical multiplism: a beginning dialogue. J Adv Nurs 1999;30:623-31.
6. Rolfe G. The pleasure of the bottomless: postmodernism, chaos, and paradigm shifts. Nurs Educ Today 1999;19:668-72.
7. Van der Zalm J, Bergum V. Hermeneutic-phenomenology: providing living knowledge for nursing practice. J Adv Nurs 2000;31:211-8.
8. Schrag CO. The self after postmodernity. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1997.
9. Scriven M. The legacy of logical positivism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press; 1969.
10. Phillips D. Philosophy, science, and social inquiry: contemporary methodological controversies in social science and related applied fields of research. New York: Pergamon; 1987.
11. Whall A. The influence of logical positivism on nursing practice. Image J Nurs Sch 1989;21:243-5.
12. Giroux H. Ideology, culture, and the process of schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1981.
13. Halfpenny P. Positivism and sociology. London: Allen & Unwin; 1982.
14. Lincoln YS, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1985.
15. Gortner SR. Nursing's syntax revisited: toward a science philosophy. Int J Nurs Stud 1993;30:447-88.
16. Carper B. Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Adv Nurs Sci 1978;1:13-23.
17. Garrard J, Rolnick S, Nitz N, Luepke L, Jackson J, Fischer L, et al. Clinical detection of depression among community-based elderly people with self-reported symptoms of depression. J Gerontol 1998;53A:M92-101.
18. Morris L. For elderly, relief for emotional ills can be elusive. New York Times. 2001 Mar 21:76.
19. Whall A, Colling KB. Suicide in the elderly: could missed identification be associated with postmodernism? Refl Nurs Lead 2001;27:8-9, 45-6.
20. Benner P, Hooper-Kytiakidis P, Stannard D. Clinical wisdom and interventions in critical care: a thinking-in-action approach. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1999.
21. Diekelmann N. The nursing curriculum: lived experiences of students. Curriculum revolution: reconceptualizing nursing education. 1989. p. 25-41. National League of Nurses Publication No.: 15-2280.
22. Fawcett J, Watson J, Neuman B, Hinton Walker P, Fitzpatrick J. On nursing theories and evidence. Image J Nurs Sch 2001;33:115-9.
23. Abbey R. Charles Taylor: philosophy now. In: John Shand, series editor. Philosophy now. Princeton (NJ): Princeton and Oxford Press; 2000.
24. Best S, Kellner D. Postmodern theory: critical interrogations. New York: Guilford; 1991.
25. Whall A. Let's get rid of all nursing theory! Nurs Sci Q 1993;6:164-5.
26. Klein S. A national agenda for geriatric education: white papers. New York: Springer; 1997.
27. Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970.
28. Laudan L. Progress and its problems. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1977.
29. Lakatos I. The methodology of scientific research programmes. In Currie JWG, editor. Philosophical papers. Vol. 1. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1977.
30. Algae D, Beck C, Kolanowski A, Whall A, Berent S, Richards K, et al. Framing an understanding of disruptive behavior in dementia. Am J Alzheimer Dis 1996;11:10-9.
31. Toulmin S. Human Understanding, Vol. 1. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1972.