Normative voice range profiles of male and female professional voice users

Journal of Voice

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-7

  Heylen, L ^a   Wuyts, Floris L ^a   Mertens, F ^a   De Bodt, M ^a   Van de Heyning, P H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Healthy voice; Normal voice; Professional voice users; Teachers; Voice range profile

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOUDNESS; MALE; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PREDICTION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SINGING; SOUND INTENSITY; VOICE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; SPEECH REHABILITATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; VOICE; VOICE QUALITY; VOICE TRAINING;

EID: 0036516707     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00065-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Schutte HK, Seidner W. Recommendation by the Union of European Phoniatricians (UEP): Standardizing Voice Area Measurement/Phonetography. Folia Phoniatr. 1983;35:286-288.
2. Van de Heyning PH, Remacle M, Van Cauwenberge P. Functional assessment of voice disorders. report of the Royal Belgian Society for Ear, Nose, Throat, Head and Neck Surgery. Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica. 1996;50: 249-396.
3. Coleman RE, Mabis JH, Hinson JK. Fundamental frequency-sound pressure level profiles of adult male and female voices. J Speech Hear Res. 1977;20:197-204.
4. Gramming P. The Phonetogram: An Experimental and Clinical Study [doctoral dissertation]. Malmö: University of Malmö; 1988.
5. Pabon JPH. Objective voice-quality parameters in the computer phonetogram. J Voice. 1991;5 (3):203-216.
6. Heylen L, Wuyts FL, Mertens F, De BM, Pattyn J, Croux C et al. Evaluation of the vocal performance of children using a voice range profile index. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998; 41(2):232-238.
7. Klingholz F, Martin F. Die quantitative Auswertung der Stimmfeldmessung. Sprache-Stimme-Gehör. 1983;7:106-110.
8. Komiyama S, Watanabe H, Ryu S. Phonetographic relationship between pitch and intensity of the human voice. Folia Phoniatr. 1984:36:1-7.
9. Pedersen MF. Change of voice in puberty in choir girls. Acta otolaryngol (Stockh). 1984; Suppl. 412:46-49.
10. Uloza V, Siupsinskiene N. Voice range profile as a tool for clinical voice assessment and monitoring. In: Kotby MN, ed. Congress Proceedings of XXIII IALP Congress, Cairo, August 1995. Cairo: IALP; 1995:37-40.
11. Wolf SK, Stanley D. Quantitative studies on the singing voice. J Acoust Soc Am. 1935;6:255-266.
12. Kotby MN, Abul-Ela MY, Orabi AA. Voice range profile as a quantitative measure of vocal function: normative data. In: Kotby MN, ed. Congress Proceedings of XXIII IALP Congress, Cairo, August 1995. Cairo: IALP;1995:46-49.
13. Awan SM. Phonetographic profiles and Fo-SPL characteristics of untrained versus trained vocal groups. J Voice. 1991; 5:41-50.
14. Sulter AM. Variation of Voice Quality Features and Effects of Voice Training in Males and Females [Doctoral dissertation]. Groningen: R.U.Groningen; 1996.
15. Schultz-Coulon HJ. Stimmfeldmessung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1990.
16. Hacki T. Die Beurteilung der quantitativen Sprechstimmleistungen. Das Sprechstimmfeld im Singstimmfeld. Folia Phoniatr. 1988;40:190-196.
17. Böhme G, Stuchlick G. Voice profiles and standard voice profile of untrained children. J Voice. 1995;9:304-307.
18. Koufman JA, Isaacson G. The spectrum of voice dysfunction. In: Koufman JA, Isaacson G, eds. Voice Disorders. Philadelphia, Pa: W.B. Saunders; 1991.
19. Coleman RF. Sources of variation in phonetograms. J Voice. 1993;7:1-14.
20. Sundberg J. Phonatory breathing - physiology behind vocal pedagogy. J Res Singing. 1987;10:3-21.