|
Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 269-273
|
Pulpal response to different pulp capping methods after pulp exposure by air abrasion.
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
4 META RESIN;
4-META RESIN;
ACRYLIC ACID RESIN;
CALCIUM HYDROXIDE;
RESIN CEMENT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTAL CARE;
DENTAL SURGERY;
DOG;
DRUG EFFECT;
ENDODONTICS;
METHODOLOGY;
ODONTOBLAST;
PATHOLOGY;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PULPITIS;
RANDOMIZATION;
TIME;
TOOTH PULP;
TOOTH PULP DISEASE;
ACRYLIC RESINS;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ANIMALS;
CALCIUM HYDROXIDE;
DENTAL CAVITY LINING;
DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION;
DENTAL PULP;
DENTAL PULP CAPPING;
DENTAL PULP EXPOSURE;
DENTIN, SECONDARY;
DOGS;
ENAMEL MICROABRASION;
ODONTOBLASTS;
PULPITIS;
RANDOM ALLOCATION;
RESIN CEMENTS;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 0036516621
PISSN: 10534628
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.3.1235wp665xmxx24u Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (0)
|