Development of educator competencies and the professional review process

Journal for Nurses in Staff Development

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 92-102

  Johnson, Sue ^a  

^a Parkview Health System   (United States)

Author keywords

Competency; Evaluation; Portfolio; Professional review

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STAFF; PEER REVIEW; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REVIEW; STANDARD;

EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; FACULTY, NURSING; HUMANS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; MODELS, NURSING; NURSING STAFF; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; STAFF DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0036516586     PISSN: 10987886     EISSN: 15389049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00124645-200203000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Nurses Association (ANA). (1988). Peer review guidelines. Kansas City, MO: American Nurses Publishing.
2. American Nurses Association (ANA). (1994). Standards for nursing professional development: Continuing education and staff development. Washington DC: American Nurses Publishing.
3. American Nurses Association Council for Professional Nursing Education and Development and the National Nursing Staff Development Organization. (1997). Report of the task force on advanced practice in nursing continuing education and staff development. Pensacola, FL: National Nursing Staff Development Organization.
4. Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
5. Bennett, H. M. (1985). Effective credentialing and peer review of nursing personnel. Critical Care Nurse, 5 (1), 104.
6. Brooks, B., Madda, M. (1999). How to organize a professional portfolio for staff and career development. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development (JNSD), 15 (1), 5-10.
7. Christensen, M. (1990). Peer auditing. Nursing Management, 21 (1), 50-52.
8. Cohen, B., Berube, C. R., Turrentine, B. (1996). A peer review program for professional nurses. Journal of Nursing Staff Development, 12 (1), 13-18.
9. Jackson, S. (1989). Peer review-Why and how to do it. Three case studies (pp. 60-86). Nurse Managers’ Bookshelf.
10. Jambunathan, J. (1992). Planning a peer review program. Journal of Nursing Staff Development, 8 (5), 235-239.
11. Jurf, J. (1992). First steps toward peer review. Journal of Nursing Staff Development, 8 (4), 184-186.
12. Keyes, M. (1994). Recognition and reward: A unit-based program. Nursing Management, 25 (2), 52-54.
13. Malkin, K. F. (1994). A standard for professional development: The use of self and peer review; Learning contracts and reflection in clinical practice. Journal of Nursing Management, 10 (2), 143-148.
14. Mann, L., Barton, C., Presti, M., Hirsch, J. (1990). Peer review in performance appraisal. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 14 (4), 9-14.
15. Puetz, B., Thomas, D. (1995). When peer review is negative, find out why. Management help line. RN, 58 (1),19.
16. Ruby, D., Barber, B., Booher, S., Fick, S., Kacuba, A., Kreskow, J., Madaras, J., McBurney, B., McKinney, J., & Swayze, S. (1995). Identifying readiness for peer review. Recruitment, Retention & Restructuring Report, 4-7.
17. Springer, P., Payne, K., Peterman, B. (1998). Rating nursing performance based on behaviors. Journal of Nursing Administration, 28 (1), 39-45.