Effects of current and potential dental etchants on nerve compound action potentials

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 149-151

  Çehreli̧, Zafer C ^a   Onur, Mehmet Ali̧ ^a   Taşman, Fügen ^a   Gümrükçüoǧlu, Ayşe ^a   Artuner, Harun ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHELATING AGENT; EDETIC ACID; FILE EZE; FILE-EZE; MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NON RINSE CONDITIONER; NON-RINSE CONDITIONER; ORGANIC COMPOUND; PEROXIDE; PHOSPHONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RC PREP; RC-PREP; SCOTCHBOND ETCHANT; UREA; WAX;

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; NERVE CONDUCTION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RAT; SCIATIC NERVE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; CHELATING AGENTS; EDETIC ACID; FEMALE; MALEATES; NEURAL CONDUCTION; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; PEROXIDES; PHOSPHONIC ACIDS; RATS; SCIATIC NERVE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; UREA; WAXES;

EID: 0036516508     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00001     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Hite KC, Cox CF, Kanca J III, Dixon DL, Farmer JB, Snuggs HM. Pulpal response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: damp versus dry primer application. Quintessence Int 1994;25:259-68.
2. Tay FR, Gwinnet AJ, Pang KN, Wei SH. Structural evidence of a sealed tissue interface with a total-etch wet-bonding technique in vivo. J Dent Res 1994;73:629-36.
3. Towbridge HO, Silver DR. A review of current approaches to in-office management of tooth hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:561-81.
4. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:497-503.
5. Pameijer CH, Stanley HR. The disastrous effects of the "Total Etch" technique in vital pulp capping in primates. Am J Dent 1998;10:45-54.
6. Brännström M, Astrom A. The hydrodynamics of the dentine: its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972:219-27.
7. Pashley DH. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. J Endodon 1986;12:465-74. (Pubitemid 17194390)
8. Blomlö f JPS, Blomlö f LB, Cederlund AL, Hultenby KR, Lindskog SF. A new concept for etching in restorative dentistry? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:31-5.
9. Cehreli ZC, Altay N. Etching effect of 17% EDTA and a non-rinse conditioner (NRC) on primary enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2000;13:64-8.
10. Brännström M, Johnson G, Nordenvall KG. Transmission of dentinal pain: resin impregnation for the desensitization of dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:612-8.
11. Nordenvall K, Malmgren B, Brännström M. Desensitization of dentin by resin impregnation: a clinical and histopathological investigation. ASDC J Dent Child 1984;31:274-6.
12. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. Micromorphological relationship between resin and dentin in vivo and in vitro. Am J Dent 1992;5:19-23.
13. Yoshiyama M, Ozaki K, Ebisu S. Morphological characterization of hypersensitive human radicular dentin and the effect of a light-curing resin liner on tubular occlusion. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88:337-44.