|
Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 129-138
|
Using comparison charts to assess performance measurement data.
a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACCREDITATION;
ARTICLE;
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT;
CESAREAN SECTION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
FEMALE;
FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
HOSPITAL;
HUMAN;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
METHODOLOGY;
MORTALITY;
NEWBORN;
NEWBORN DISEASE;
PREGNANCY;
QUALITY CONTROL;
STANDARD;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
STATISTICS;
SURGERY;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
ACCREDITATION;
BENCHMARKING;
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT;
CESAREAN SECTION;
DATA COLLECTION;
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE SURVEYS;
HOSPITALS;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES;
JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS;
ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES;
OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
PREGNANCY;
QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;
THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0036512893
PISSN: 10703241
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28014-1 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (0)
|