The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia

Journal of Voice

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 20-27

  Heman Ackah, Yolanda D ^a   Michael, Deirdre D ^b   Goding Jr , George S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic analysis; Breathiness; Cepstral peak prominence; CPPS c ; CPPS s; Dysphonia; Roughness

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BREATHING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PITCH; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RATING SCALE; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE PALSY; REINNERVATION; RELIABILITY; HOSPITALIZATION; LARYNX DISORDER; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SPEECH;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; VOICE DISORDERS;

EID: 0036512599     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00067-X     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hillenbrand J, Houde RA. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: dysphonic voices and continuous speech. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39:311-321.
2. Laver J, Hiller S, Beck JM. Acoustic waveform perturbations and voice disorders. J Voice. 1992;6:115-126.
3. Titze IR. Principles of Voice Production. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc; 1994.
4. Deliyski DD. Acoustic model and evaluation of pathological voice production. In: MDVP Model 4305 Operations Manual. Pine Brook, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corporation; 1993:183-186.
5. Hillenbrand J. A methodological study of perturbation and additive noise in synthetically generated voice signals. J Speech Hear Res. 1987;30:448-461.
6. Wolfe V, Fitch J, Cornell R. Acoustic prediction of severity in commonly occurring voice problems. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38:273-279.
7. Bielamowicz S, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Dauer MS, Berke GS. Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39:126-134.
8. Deal R, Emanuel F. Some waveform and speech features of vowel roughness. J Speech Hear Res. 1978;21:250-264.
9. Yumoto E, Sasaki Y, Okamura H. Harmonics-to-noise ratio and psychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness. J Speech Hear Res. 1984;27:2-6.
10. Nichols A. Jitter and shimmer related to vocal roughness: A comment on the Deal and Emanuel study. J Speech Hear Res. 1979;22:670-671.
11. Hillenbrand J, Cleveland RA, Erickson RL. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;37: 769-778.
12. Michael DD. Ratings of speech naturalness in persons with dysphonia. Poster Presentation at: The American Speech-Language and Hearing Association Meeting; November 1998; San Antonio, TX.
13. Olson DE, Goding GS, Michael DD. Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of laryngeal reinnervation by ansa cervicalis transfer. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:1767-1772.
14. Smith B, Weinberg B, Feth L, Horii Y. Vocal jitter and roughness characteristics of esophageal speech. J Speech Hear Res. 1978;21:240-249.
15. Wolfe V, Steinfatt R. Prediction of vocal severity within and across voice types. J Speech Hear Res. 1987;30:230-240.
16. Klingholz F, Martin F. Quantitative spectral evaluation of shimmer and jitter. J Speech Hear Res. 1985;28:169-174.