Stapling anopexy VS. traditional haemorrhoidectomy: Comparative outcome of two groups of patients;Emorroidectomia con stapler VS. emorroidectomia tradizionale: Risultati comparativi tra due gruppi di pazienti

Annali Italiani di Chirurgia

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 181-184

  Gentile, M ^a   Cricri A M ^a   D'Antonio, D ^a   Bucci, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Anopexy; Haemorrhoidectomy; Postoperative pain; Ruber band ligation; Stapler

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMORRHOID; HUMAN; LIGATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM PROLAPSE; STAPLER; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; LIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECTAL PROLAPSE; SURGICAL STAPLERS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0036510948     PISSN: 0003469X     EISSN: 2239253X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Phillips R., Milligan M.: Haemorrhoidectomy. Atti Colorectal disease in the new millennium F.t Lauderdale, Florida, 2000.
2. Carapeti E., Phillips R.K.S.: Modern treatment for internal haemorrhoids. Br Med J, 315: 881, 1997.
3. Nystrom P.O.: Circular stapler haemorrhoidectomy. Atti Colorectal disease in the new millennium. F.t Lauderdale, Florida, 2000.
4. Ferguson J.A., Heaton J.R.: Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 2:176-83, 1959.
5. Milligan E.T.C., Morgan C, Naughton Jones L.F., Office R.R.: Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet, 2:1119-1124, 1937.
6. Kohlstadt CM., Weber J., Prohm P.: Stapler haemorrhoidectomy. A new alternative to conventional methods. Zentralbl Chir, 124:238-43, 1999.
7. th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Monduzzi Editore, 777-84, 1998.
8. Smellie G.D.: Control of post-haemorrhoidectomy bleeding with a Foley catheter and a pack. J R Coll Surg Edinb, 10: 328, 1965.
9. Wolfe J.S., Munoz J.J., Rosin J.D.: Srvey of Haemorrhoidectomy practices: open versus closed techniques. Dis Colon Rectum, 22:536-8, 1979.
10. Roe A.M., Bartolo D.C., Vellacott K.D., Locke-Edmunds J., Mortensen N.J.: Submucosal versus ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy: a comparison of anal sensation, anal sphincter manometry and postoperative pain and function. Br J Surg, 74:948-51, 1987.
11. London N.J., Bramley P.D., Windle R.: Effect of four days of preoperative lactulose on posthaemorrhoidectomy pain: results of placebo controlled trial. BMJ, 295:363-4, 1987.
12. Carapeti E.A., Kamm M.A., McDonald P.J., Chadwick S.J.D., Phillips R.K.S.: Randomised trial of open versus closed day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 86:612-3, 1999.
13. Cheng F.C., Shum D.W., Ong G.B.: The treatment of second degree haemorrhoids bu injection, rubber band ligation, maximal anal dilatation, and haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective clinical trial. Aust NZ J Surg, 51:458-62, 1981.
14. Pescatori M., Favetta U., Dedola S., Orsini S.: Trans anal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech Coloproct, 1: 96-98 [PubMed], 1997.
15. Kohlstadt CM., Weber J., Prohm P.: Stapler haemorrhoidectomy. A new alternative to conventional methods. Zentralbl Chir, 124:238-43, 1999.
16. Mehigan B.J., Monson J.R.T., Hartley J.E.: Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 355:782-85, 2000.
17. Rowsell M., Bello M., Hemingway D.M.: Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 355:779-81, 2000.
18. Milligan E.T.C., Morgan C.N., Jones L.E., Officer R.: Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet, 2:1119-24, 1937.
19. Ho Y.H., Tan M., Leong A., Eu K.W., Nyam D., Seow-Choen F.: Anal pressures impaired by stapler insertion during colorectal anastomosis: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum, 42: 89-95 [Pub Med], 1999.
20. Tuckson W.B., Lavery I.C., Fazio V.W., Oakley J., Church J.M., Milsom J.W.: Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg, 6:90-96, 1991.