Unsafe presumptions in clinical research

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 49-51

  Rhodes, Rosamond ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAMORPHINE;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; ETHICS; EUROPE; HEROIN DEPENDENCE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MENTAL CAPACITY; NORTH AMERICA; NOTE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

CLINICAL TRIALS; ETHICS, RESEARCH; EUROPE; HEROIN; HEROIN DEPENDENCE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNATIONALITY; MENTAL COMPETENCY; NORTH AMERICA; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RISK ASSESSMENT; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 0036510828     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651602317533703     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Charland, L. C. 2002. Cynthia’s dilemma: Consenting to heroin prescription. American Journal of Bioethics 2(2):37-47.
2. Faden, R., and T. L. Beauchamp. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Gert, B., K. D. Clouser, and C. Culver. 1997. Bioethics: A return to fundamentals. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Jonas, H. 1980. Philosophical reflections on experimentation with human subjects. In Philosophical essays: From ancient creed to technological man, 105-31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Miller, F. G., and H. Brody. 2002. What makes plaebo-controlled trials unethical? American Journal of Bioethics 2(2):3-9.