Structure of the virtual Compton amplitude with an additional final-state meson in the extended Bjorken region

Physical Review D

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2002, Pages

  Blümlein, Johannes ^a   Eilers, Jörg ^b   Geyer, Bodo ^b   Robaschik, Dieter ^c  

^a DESY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c BRANDENBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPTON EFFECT; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; KINEMATICS; PHOTON; POLARIZATION;

EID: 0036496328     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.054029     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. F. J. Yndurain, Quantum Chromodynamics. An Introduction to the Theory of Quarks and Gluons (Springer, New York, 1983);
2. Lectures on QCD. II: Applications, edited by F. Lenz, H. Grieshammer, and D. Stoll (Springer, Berlin, 1997).
3. T. Muta, Foundations of QCD. An Introduction to Perturbative Methods in Gauge Theories (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
4. D. Müller, D. Roboaschik, B. Geyer, J. Horejsi, and F. M. Dittes, Fortschr. Phys. 42, 101 (1994).
5. X. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 610 (1997);
6. Phys. Rev. D 55, 7114 (1997);
7. J. Phys. G 24, 1181 (1998);
8. A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B 385, 333 (1996);
9. Phys. Rev. D 56, 5524 (1997);
10. I. I. Balitsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B 413, 114 (1997).
11. J. Blümlein, B. Geyer, and D. Robaschik, Phys. Lett. B 406, 161 (1997).
12. J. Blümlein, B. Geyer, and D. Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. B560, 283 (1999).
13. J. Blümlein and D. Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. B581, 449 (2000).
14. M. Vanderhaeghen, Eur. Phys. J. A 8, 455 (2000);
15. K. Goeke, M. Polyakov, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47, 401 (2001).
16. ZEUS Collaboration, P. Saull, hep-ex/0003030; Abstract 564, EPS HEP Budapest, 2001.
17. H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff et al., Phys. Lett. B 517, 47 (2001).
18. HERMES Collaboration, A. Airapetian et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 182001 (2001).
19. MAMI Collaboration, Nucl. Phys. A666, 44 (2000);
20. MAMI Collaboration, J. Roche et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 708 (2000).
21. G. Audit et al., TJNAF experiment 93-050;
22. B. B. Wojtsekhovskii et al., TJNAF experiment 99-114;
23. J. P. Chen et al., TJNAF experiment 00-110.
24. Similarly to the case of deep-inelastic nonforward scattering multiple hadron final states also emerge in deep-inelastic diffractive scattering [39] along the diffractive final state proton, which is assumed an isolated particle in the ideal case, Ref. [40].
25. As has been shown recently in Ref. [40], also the case of deep inelastic diffractive scattering can be described following similar lines.
26. S. A. Anikin and O. I. Zavialov, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 116, 135 (1978).
27. B. Geyer, M. Lazar, and D. Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. B559, 339 (1999).
28. B. Geyer, M. Lazar, and D. Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. B618, 99 (2001).
29. D. J. Gross and S. B. Treiman, Phys. Rev. D 4, 1059 (1971).
30. B. Geyer and M. Lazar, Nucl. Phys. B581, 341 (2000).
31. R. I. Jaffe and X. Ji, Nucl. Phys. B375, 527 (1991).
32. B. Geyer and M. Lazar, Phys. Rev. D 63, 094003 (2001).
33. I. Balitsky and V. Braun, Nucl. Phys. B361, 93 (1991).
34. 2/ν) as well known from the case of forward scattering, see, e.g., Ref. [27]. Although the second structure appears as kinematically suppressed it is still present and a WW-like relation between the twist-2 contributions of the two amplitudes exists. For other choices of the spin vector this suppression does not occur.
35. S. Wandzura and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. 72B, 195 (1977).
36. a as well; in some cases twist-3 terms are present in the massless limit. These contributions are not dealt with in the present paper. We mention that in the case when quark and target mass corrections are taken into account all contributions may receive higher twist corrections starting with twist-3, as has been shown for the forward case in Ref.
37. Integral relations between higher twist contributions do also exist.
38. J. Blümlein and A. Tkabladze, Nucl. Phys. B553, 427 (1999);
39. J. Phys. G 25, 1553 (1999);
40. Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 79, 541 (2000).
41. J. Blümlein and D. Kochelev, Phys. Lett. B 381, 296 (1996);
42. Nucl. Phys. B498, 285 (1997).
43. P. Ball and M. Lazar, Phys. Lett. B 515, 131 (2001).
44. M. Lazar, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 029 (2001).
45. A. V. Belitsky and D. Müller, Nucl. Phys. B589, 611 (2000);
46. N. Kivel, M. V. Polyakov, A. Schäfer, and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Lett. B 497, 73 (2001);
47. A. V. Radyushkin and C. Weiss, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114012 (2001);
48. I. V. Anikin and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Lett. B 509, 95 (2001).
49. C. G. Callan and D. J. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 156 (1969).
50. H. Georgi and H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. D 14, 1829 (1976).
51. Th. Braunschweig, B. Geyer, and D. Robaschik, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 44, 407 (1987).
52. I. Balitsky and V. Braun, Nucl. Phys. B311, 541 (1989).
53. A. P. Prudnikov, Yu. A. Brychov, and O. I. Marichev, Integrals and Series. Vol. 2: Special Functions (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1992).
54. H. Bateman and A. Erdelyi, Higher Transcendental Functions (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953), Vol. 2.
55. M. Diehl, T. Gousset, B. Pire, and J. P. Ralston, Phys. Lett. B 411, 193 (1997).
56. ZEUS Collaboration, J. Breitweg et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 6, 43 (1999);
57. H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff et al., Z. Phys. C 76, 613 (1997).
58. J. Blümlein and D. Robaschik, Phys. Lett. B 517, 222 (2001).